3

Is it true that $\int_0^A dx \int_0^B dy f(x) f(y) = 2 \int_0^A dx \int_0^x dy f(x) f(y)$ ? If so, can this be proved?

3 Answers3

2

Let's assume for simplicity that $f$ has an anti-derivative $F$. To simplify notation, write $F_t = F(t)$. Then the left-hand side yields

$$\int_0^A f(x) dx \times \int_0^B f(y) dy = (F_A-F_0)\cdot (F_B-F_0)$$

while the right-hand side becomes

$$\begin{split} 2 \int_0^A f(x)dx \int_0^x f(y) dy &= 2 \int_0^A f(x) (F_x - F_0)dx \\ &= 2 \int_0^A f(x) F_x dx - 2F_0 (F_A - F_0) \\ &= (F_A^2 - F_0^2) - 2F_0 (F_A - F_0) \\ &= (F_A - F_0) \cdot (F_A + F_0 - 2F_0) \\ &= (F_A - F_0)^2 \end{split} $$

So these coincide if and only if $F_A = F_B$ or $F_A=F_0$.

EDIT A clarification comment. $\int F_x f(x) dx$ is integrated by subtitution with $u=F_x$ and then $du = f(x) dx$.

gt6989b
  • 54,422
2

Yes, it's true by symmetry. The function $F(x,y)=f(x)f(y)$ is symmetric about the line $y=x$. The first integral is over the square, the second is over the bottom triangle. To give a formula, add $\int_0^1 dy\int_0^y dx$, which is clearly equal to the given integral on the RHS.

Ted Shifrin
  • 115,160
1

My answer is essentially the same as gt6989b's, but I will leave it in case the difference in presentation is useful.

Define $$ F(x)=\int_0^xf(y)\,\mathrm{d}y $$ Then $f(x)=F'(x)$ and $$ \begin{align} 2\int_0^A\int_0^x f(x)f(y)\,\mathrm{d}y\,\mathrm{d}x &=2\int_0^Af(x)F(x)\,\mathrm{d}x\\ &=2\int_0^AF'(x)F(x)\,\mathrm{d}x\\ &=F(A)^2\\ &=\left(\int_0^Af(x)\,\mathrm{d}x\right)^2 \end{align} $$ However, $$ \int_0^A\int_0^B f(x)f(y)\,\mathrm{d}y\,\mathrm{d}x =\left(\int_0^Af(x)\,\mathrm{d}x\right)\left(\int_0^Bf(y)\,\mathrm{d}y\right) $$ Thus, your equation is true if $$ \int_0^Af(x)\,\mathrm{d}x=\int_0^Bf(y)\,\mathrm{d}y $$ or if $$ \int_0^Af(x)\,\mathrm{d}x=0 $$

robjohn
  • 345,667
  • +1 - more general than my answer - I didn't want to bother with the integrals :) – gt6989b May 17 '13 at 17:56
  • @gt6989b: Since question is assuming that $\int_0^xf(y),\mathrm{d}y$ exists, $f$ has an antiderivative, so I don't really think mine is any more general. – robjohn May 17 '13 at 18:58