2

enter image description here

It is the symbol I used to show left hand side of inequality isn't greater than right hand side.

More precisely I used this to show the below matrix is not diagonally dominant:

$$\begin{bmatrix}5&6&7\\ 2&-4&2\\ 3&2&-5\\ \end{bmatrix}$$

So at the first row I want to emphasize that $|5|$ is not greater than $|6|+|7|$ therefor instead of writing $|5|<|6|+|7|$ I used the symbol in the image above.

Is it ok to use this symbol in mathematics?

Etemon
  • 6,437

2 Answers2

4

To me, it is OK. Putting a bar/cross on a pre-existing maths symbol just means the negation of it.

I'm not sure it is standardized, though.

Edit

As shown by @Dietrich Burde in his answer, these symbols are $\LaTeX$ symbols, so that's clearly OK you can use them.

LaTeX symbols with negations.

Contestosis
  • 1,214
3

I would also say that we have both relations $$ x \not\le y, \quad x\not \ge y. $$ There are variants, of course, like $$ x \lneq y,\quad x \gneq y $$ and $$ x\nless y, x\ngtr y $$

Dietrich Burde
  • 130,978
  • Just to say: I'd have no guess as to how to interpret $x\lneq y$. To the extent that it means "$x$ is less than but not equal to $y$" then you could just write $x<y$, so I'd imagine that it meant something else...but what? I would not guess that it meant $x>y$. – lulu Dec 17 '20 at 15:25
  • @lulu The second option has its own LateX command, but it seems just to say that $x<y$ or $x>y$, I agree. Perhaps this is more evident for sets, where $A \subsetneq B$ explicitly says that equality doesn't hold, because $A\subset B$ is ambiguous. – Dietrich Burde Dec 17 '20 at 15:48
  • Ah, good point. I agree, I wouldn't take $A\subset B$ to exclude $A=B$. – lulu Dec 17 '20 at 15:50