7

I am trying to evaluate the following integral using the method of contour which I am not being able to. Can anyone point out what mistake I am making? $$\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin ax}{e^x + 1}dx$$

I am considering the following contour. And function $\displaystyle f(z):= \frac{e^{iaz}}{e^z + 1}$ enter image description here

The pole of order $1$ occours at odd multiple of $i\pi$. By considering above contour there is no singularity. The integral can be broken down into six parts.

$$\int_0^R \frac{e^{iax}}{e^x + 1} dx + i \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{e^{ia(R + iy)}}{e^{R + iy} + 1} dy + \int_{R}^{0}\frac{e^{ia(x+2\pi i)}}{e^{x + 2 \pi i } + 1} dx + \\ i \int_{2 \pi }^{\pi + \epsilon} \frac{e^{ai( iy)}}{e^{ iy } + 1}dy + \int_\gamma \frac{e^{iaz}}{e^z + 1} dz + i \int_{ \pi -\epsilon}^{0} \frac{e^{ia( iy)}}{e^{ iy } + 1}dy$$

First and third gives $\displaystyle (1 - e^{-2 a\pi})\int_0^R\frac{e^{iax}}{e^x + 1} dx$. Second goes to $0$ as $R \to \infty$

For fifth integral, $$\int_\gamma \frac{e^{iaz}}{e^z + 1} dz = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{e^{ia\pi + a\epsilon e^{i\theta}}}{e^{i\pi + \epsilon e^{i\theta}+1}}i \epsilon i e^{i\theta }d\theta \to 0 \text{ as } \epsilon \to 0$$

The real part of fourth and sixth integral does not converge. But since my original integral is imaginary, it suffices to take imaginary part. As $\epsilon \to 0$, I get $$i\int_{2\pi }^0 \Re \left [\frac{e^{-ay}}{e^{iy} + 1} \right] dy = i \int_{2\pi}^0 \frac{e^{-ay}}{2}dy = i \frac{e^{-2\pi a} - 1}{2a}$$

Finally using residue theorem, I am geting which is incorrect. $$(1 - e^{-2 a\pi})\int_0^\infty \Im \left [\frac{e^{iax}}{e^x + 1} \right ] dx +\frac{e^{-2\pi a} - 1}{2a} = 0$$

Can anyone point out my mistake or give worked out solution?? Thanks in advance!!

ADDED:: I evaluated fifth integral incorrectly $$\int_\gamma \frac{e^{iaz}}{e^z + 1} dz = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{e^{ia(i\pi + \epsilon e^{i\theta})}}{e^{i\pi + \epsilon e^{i\theta}}+1}i \epsilon e^{i\theta }d\theta = ie^{-a\pi}\int_{\pi/2}^{-\pi/2}\frac{e^{ia\epsilon e^{i\theta}}}{-e^{\epsilon e^{i\theta}} + 1} \epsilon e^{i\theta}d\theta = i \pi e^{-a\pi}$$ So the total sum should be $$(1 - e^{-2 a\pi})\int_0^\infty \Im \left [\frac{e^{iax}}{e^x + 1} \right ] dx +\frac{e^{-2\pi a} - 1}{2a} +\pi e^{-a\pi}= 0 $$ After slight manipulation we find that $$\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin ax}{e^x + 1}dx = -\frac{\pi}{2\sinh (\pi a)} +\frac{1}{2a}$$

Mula Ko Saag
  • 2,177
  • 1
  • 23
  • 45
  • Woops!! I found one ... I think this is worng $$\int_\gamma \frac{e^{iaz}}{e^z + 1} dz = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{e^{ia\pi + a\epsilon e^{i\theta}}}{e^{i\pi + \epsilon e^{i\theta}+1}}i \epsilon i e^{i\theta }d\theta \to 0 \text{ as } \epsilon \to 0$$ – Mula Ko Saag May 18 '13 at 11:46
  • Since it is a simple pole, it goes to $- i \pi \text{Res}[f,i \pi]$. – Random Variable May 18 '13 at 12:57
  • And you have the integral limits reversed. – Random Variable May 18 '13 at 13:30
  • @RandomVariable i took a little detour at $i \pi$ the residue must be zero. – Mula Ko Saag May 18 '13 at 16:23
  • The residue at $z= i \pi$ is nonzero. Taking a detour doesn't somehow cancel the residue there . That limit (with the integral limits reversed) goes to $- i \pi \text{Res}[f, i \pi]$. It's called the fractional residue theorem. – Random Variable May 18 '13 at 16:34
  • @RandomVariable sorry, I didn't know ... could you check above edited solution above? perhaps it is equal to $-\int_\gamma$ in my above answer. Thank you very much for info. This way i can avoid calculating the above integral. – Mula Ko Saag May 18 '13 at 16:39
  • It looks OK. The theorem is just a shortcut. It's theorem number 9 at the following link: http://www.math.umn.edu/~edman/tex/CA_prelim.pdf – Random Variable May 18 '13 at 16:47
  • @RandomVariable thank you very much!! – Mula Ko Saag May 18 '13 at 16:48

1 Answers1

3

Combine the 4th and 6th integrals to get the Cauchy principal value:

$$PV \int_{\pi}^0 dy \frac{e^{-a y}}{1+e^{i y}} = PV \int_{\pi}^0dy \frac{e^{-a y}}{2 \cos{(y/2)}} e^{-iy/2} $$

You still need to evaluate the imaginary part of the integral.

Ron Gordon
  • 138,521