I am having some difficulty understanding the definitions of Hamiltonian isotopy and Hamiltonian symplectomorphism. I know that if we have a Hamiltonian function $H: M \to \mathbb{R}$, we have a Hamiltonian vector field $X_H$ associated with it using the symplectic form. Now, every vector field generates a flow $\phi^t_{H}:M \to M$ and, if we consider $t=1$, we have a diffeomorphism $\phi^1_{H}: M \to M$. Some people call this a Hamiltonian symplectomophism.
The problem is, I have seen another definition which considers a time-dependent Hamiltonian function $H:[0,1] \times M \to \mathbb{R}$. Denoting $H_s(x) := H(s,x)$, each $H_s: M \to \mathbb{R}$ is a Hamiltonian function in the former sense, so we have for each $s$ the associated Hamiltonian vector field $X_{H_s}$, which generates a flow $\phi^{t}_{H_s}$.
Now here is where I get confused. Some people just denote this $\phi^t_{H}$ and call it the Hamiltonian isotropy, but I think the time-dependence gets "forgotten" as if this were a flow, not a time-dependent family of flows. After that, they define a Hamiltonian symplectomorphism as $\phi^1_{H}$, but I have no idea which $s \in [0,1]$ and $H_s$ is being considered, so I don't know how this $\phi^1_{H}$, which for me should be $\phi^1_{H_s}$, is a symplectomophism from $M$ to $M$.