1

My intuition is that this is true, because it makes sense for little sets (with cardinalities $|\mathbb{N}|,|2^\mathbb{N}|$). But i'm not sure at all that this is actually true.

If it's not, what's the real relation between $|B^A|$ and $|B|,|A|$.

(Obviously talking about infinite sets)

R.V.N.
  • 747
  • I've already proved that if $|B|\leq|A|$ then $|B^A|=|\mathcal{P}(A)|$. – R.V.N. Jan 30 '21 at 15:45
  • If the notation "B^A" ever seemed weird to you (as it did to me) it's worth speculating about why somebody may have chosen it. (It almost seems like a trick question, but it isn't.) – leslie townes Jan 30 '21 at 15:51

1 Answers1

1

Surely not true for finite sets. Counterexample

$$A=\{1,2\} \text{ and } B = \{1,2,3\}.$$

And if Singular cardinals hypothesis is assumed, the result is again wrong as

$$\text{if } \vert \mathcal P(A) \vert \lt \vert B \vert \text{ and } \text{cf} \vert B \vert \le \vert A \vert \text{ then } \vert B^A \vert = \vert B \vert^+$$