I am currently learning the history of calculus, and I am really curious about the Ancient Egyptian way to get an Area of Quadrilateral. So, I hope I could get some enlightenment.
Here is the Egyptian Way:
Consider Quadrilateral with 4 different lengths a,b,c,d. (a,c are facing each other, and b,d are facing each other.) (Each set of sides may not be parallel.)
They calculated the area as follows, $$A=\frac{a+c}{2}\times \frac{b+d}{2}$$
However, we know this is wrong, but I want to show if this method is overestimated or underestimated, and why.
P.S. I think they tried this way because getting an Area of rectangular is the easiest way, and they decided to make rectangular with lengths of averages of two opposite sides. And this new area somehow looks similar (close) to the original area.
