Is it because it's the likelihood that we get a test statistic under the conditions we set of $H_0$ and $H_1$, the alternative hypothesis that causes us to accept the null hypothesis when it's false?
What is the reasoning behind this?
Thank You
Is it because it's the likelihood that we get a test statistic under the conditions we set of $H_0$ and $H_1$, the alternative hypothesis that causes us to accept the null hypothesis when it's false?
What is the reasoning behind this?
Thank You
I don't really understand what you are asking..there are two types of errors when testing, they are
The corresponding probabilities are
\begin{align*} P(\text{reject } H_0| H_0 \text{ correct}) &= \alpha = \text{ level of test (significance)}\\ P(\text{accept } H_0| H_1 \text{ correct}) &= 1-\beta = 1-\text{ power of test} \end{align*}
So we have $$ \beta = 1- P(\text{accept } H_0| H_1 \text{ correct}) = P(\text{reject } H_0| H_1 \text{ correct}) $$
When testing, we wish to minimize level, and maximize power, since this would lead to a reduction in both types of errors, but this is in general not possible. So what we do instead is specify an acceptable level $\alpha$, say $\alpha=0.05$, and then search over all possible tests with fixed $\alpha$ and maximum $\beta$.