Say whether the following verification of the method of induction is valid or not?
Proof: We have to prove that if
- $A(1)$
- $(∀n)[A(n) ⇒ A(n + 1)]$
then $(∀n)A(n)$.
We argue by contradiction. Suppose the conclusion is false. Then there will be a natural number n such that: not $A(n)$. Let m be the least such number. By the first condition, $m > 1$, so $m = n + 1$ for some n. Since $n < m, A(n)$. Then by the second condition, $A(n + 1)$, i.e., $A(m)$. This is a contradiction, and that proves the result.
The answer to this question is that the proof is valid. But I do not understand the reasoning in the proof at: Since $n < m, A(n)$. Could someone please explain what we are considering here? Why is it $A(n)$?