Well, I think this "chain form" of base changing is as it another form of another identity in reversing ts proof
$\large n^{\log_bx} = x^{\log_bn}$
One revering its simple proof is:
$\large c^{\log_ab} = b^{\log_ac}$
$\large \Rightarrow \log_bc^{log_ab}=log_bb^{log_ac}$
$\large \Rightarrow \log_ab\cdot \log_bc=\log_bb\cdot \log_ac$
$\large \Rightarrow \log_ab\cdot \log_bc=1\cdot \log_ac$
\begin{align}\log_a b\times\log_b c=\log_a c\end{align}
One simple proof is:
$\log_ab\cdot \log_bc=1\cdot \log_ac$
$\large \Rightarrow \log_ab\cdot \log_bc=\log_bb\cdot \log_ac$
$\large \Rightarrow \log_bc^{log_ab}=log_bb^{log_ac}$
$\large \Rightarrow \large c^{\log_ab} = b^{\log_ac}$
Then how do we proceed our proof from two terms to many terms? Use \begin{align}\log_a b = \frac{\log_c b}{\log_c a}\end{align}
$\log_a b\times\log_b c\times\log_c d\times\log_d e\times\cdots\times\log_y z=\log_a z$
$\large \Rightarrow \large \frac{1}{\log_b a} \times \log_b c \times \frac{1}{log_dc} \times \log_d e \times \cdots\times\log_y z=\log_a z$
$\large \Rightarrow \large \frac{ \log_b c}{\log_b a} \times \frac{\log_d e}{log_dc} \times \frac{\log_f g}{log_fe}\times \cdots\times\log_y z=\log_a z$
$\large \Rightarrow \large \log_a c \times log_ce \times \log_eg \times \log_gi \times \log_ik \times \log_km \times \log_mo \times \log_oq \times \log_qs \times \log_su \times \log_uw \times \log_wy \times\log_y z=\log_a z$
$\large \Rightarrow \large \cdots$
$\large \Rightarrow \large \log_ae \times \log_ei \times \log_im \times \log_mq \times \log_qu \times \log_uy \times\log_y z=\log_a z$
$\large \Rightarrow \large \cdots$
$\large \Rightarrow \large \log_ai \times \log_iq \times \log_qy \times\log_y z=\log_a z$
$\large \Rightarrow \large \cdots$
$\large \Rightarrow \large \log_aq \times \log_qy \times\log_y z=\log_a z$
$\large \Rightarrow \large \cdots$
$\large \Rightarrow \large \log_ay \times\log_y z=\log_a z$
$\large \Rightarrow \large \cdots$
$\large \Rightarrow \large \log_a z=\log_a z$