0

A Lie algebra is is a vector space $L$ equipped with a Lie bracket $[\cdot,\cdot]$.

Given linearly independent vectors $e_1,...,e_n$ and structure constants $[e_i,e_j]=\sum_{k=1}^n a^k_{ij}e_k$ is there a quick way to check if this is a lie algebra

I was trying to show that the sum of two subalgebras need not be a subalgebra and couldn't think of the obvious example of taking an sl-2 tripple. So I tried to define $L=\text{span}(s_1,s_2,t_1,t_2,e_1,e_2)$ by $[s_1,s_2]=s_1$, $[t_1,t_2]=t_1$,$[s_i,t_i]=e_i$. This would give that $S+T$ was not a subalgebra. One can go through the motions of checking all the relations by hand and seeing what we should define the bracket on $e_1,e_2$ but is there a nicer way to ensure that something will be a lie algebra?

  • As regards the second question, in a Lie algebra every 1-dim subspace is a Lie subalgebra. But for a non-abelian Lie algebra of dim $\ge 3$ not every 2-dimensional subspace is a subalgebra. – YCor Jun 10 '21 at 19:40
  • For the first question I like to view it as follows: in a (non-associative) algebra, define $J(x,y,z)=x(yz)+y(zx)+z(xy). If the algebra is skew-symmetric, J is alternating. So one checks its vanishing on a basis: J(e_i,e_j,e_k)=0 whenever i<j<k. – YCor Jun 10 '21 at 19:43

1 Answers1

1

There are two questions, it seems. The first one is about checking skew-symmetry and Jacobi identity for given structures constants. For a fixed basis $(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$ of a vector space $V$ a Lie bracket $\mu$ is determined by the point $(c_{ij}^r)\in k^{n^3}$ of structure constants with \begin{equation*} \mu(x_i,x_j) = \sum_{r=1}^n c_{ij}^r x_r \end{equation*} satisfying the polynomial conditions \begin{align*} 0 & =c_{ij}^r + c_{ji}^r, \\ 0 & =\sum_{r=1}^n (c_{ij}^r c_{lr}^s+c_{jk}^r c_{ir}^s+c_{ki}^r c_{jr}^s). \end{align*} for $1\le i<j<k\le n,\; 1\le s\le n$, given by skew-symmetry and Jacobi's identity.

There is no shortcut to checking or solving these equations for the structure constants in general. In special cases there is nothing to check. For example, they are automatically satisfied, if $[e_i,e_j]=e_i\cdot e_j-e_j\cdot e_i$, with a Lie-admissible $K$-bilinear product $V \times V\rightarrow V$.

Reference: What does the Jacobi identity impose on structure constants?

The second question is, whether or not $S+T$, the sum of two subalgebras, is again a subalgebra. This need not be the case. Let $L=\mathfrak{sl}_2(K)$ with standard basis $(e_1,e_2,e_3)$ and $[e_1,e_2]=e_3$, $[e_1,e_3]=-2e_1$, $[e_2,e_3]=2e_2$. Then take $S=\langle e_1\rangle$ and $T=\langle e_2\rangle$ as the abelian $1$-dimensional subalgebras generated by $e_1$ respectively $e_2$. Then $S+T=\langle e_1,e_2\rangle$ is not a Lie subalgebra, since $[e_1,e_2]$ is not in the subspace.

Dietrich Burde
  • 130,978
  • Thank, the "second question" was only mean to give the example of why i was trying to do such a thing. Is there any statement we could make like for $[s_1,s_2]=s_1$, $[t_1,t_2]=t_1$,$[s_i,t_i]=e_i$ that there must be some way to define $[e_i,-]$ such that the jacobi identity is satisfied? – samlanader Jun 09 '21 at 17:03
  • I think the direct way here is the best. We just try to satisfy the Jacobi identity by looking at the equations. – Dietrich Burde Jun 09 '21 at 18:10