Given the conversion table of these data points of temperatures in Celsius and the respective value in Fahrenheit:
\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline C & 10 & 20 & 30 \\ \hline F & 50 & 68 & 86 \\ \hline \end{array}
To calculate the mean in Celsius:
$\bar{x_{C}} = \dfrac{10 + 20 + 30}{3} = 20$
and standard deviation:
$\sigma_{C} = \sqrt{\dfrac{(10 - 20)^2 + (20-20)^2 + (30-20)^2}{3}} \approx 8.165$
Now, you could calculate mean and standard deviation for the values in Fahrenheit using the same process:
$\bar{x_{F}} = \dfrac{50 + 68 + 86}{3} = 68$
and standard deviation:
$\sigma_{F} = \sqrt{\dfrac{(50 -68)^2 + (68 - 68)^2 + (86 - 68)^2}{3}} \approx 14.7$
But, since we already have a formula for converting Celsius to Fahrenheit:
$ F = 1.8 \cdot C + 32 $
We can obtain the mean with:
$ \bar{x_{F}} = 1.8 \cdot \bar{x_C} + 32 $
$ \hspace{1.5em} = 1.8 \cdot 20 + 32 $
$ \hspace{1.5em} = 68 $
But if we try to obtain the standard deviation:
$ \sigma_{F} = 1.8 \cdot \sigma_{C} + 32 $
$ \hspace{1.5em} = 1.8 \cdot 8.165 + 32 $
$ \hspace{1.5em} \approx 46.7 $
And that:
$\sigma_{F} = 1.8 \cdot \sigma_{C}$
$\hspace{1.5em} = 1.8 \cdot 8.165$
$\hspace{1.5em} \approx 14.7$
Which is correct.
Trying it with other data values seems to show the same result.
It seems standard deviation isn't influenced by the displacement values, for example, adding 5 to each value in the data set would yield the same standard deviation, but multiplying by 2 would increase it. But, its still confusing. Can someone explain why the formula doesn't work? Thanks
bdoes indeed cancel. This explanation was great, thanks. – jackw11111 Jun 14 '21 at 05:14