0

This example shows that two processes $X,Y$ can be a modification of one another, but they don't necessarily need to be indistinguishable.

  • Let $T$ be a continuous random variable with continuous distribution.
  • Let $X_t\equiv 0$ and $Y_t = \begin{cases} 0,& t \neq T\\ 1,& t =T\end{cases}$.
  • It is clear to me that $Y$ is a modification of $X$.
  • It is clear to me that given a fixed $t\geq 0$ we have that $P(X_t = Y_t) = P(T\neq t)$.
  • It is not clear to me why $P(T \neq t) = 1$
  • It is not clear to me why $P(X_s = Y_s \hspace{0.2cm};\forall s \geq 0) =0$

Given that $T$ is an arbitrary continuous random variable with continuous distribution, why does that set $\{ \omega \in \Omega: T(\omega) \neq t\}$ need to have probability 1?

Moreover, on the last point, I have been trying to prove that using $\{X_s = Y_s; \forall s \geq 0\} = \cap_{s\geq 0} \{ \omega \in \Omega : X_s(\omega) = Y_s(\omega)\}$, is this the right way to do that?

I am new to probabilistic reasoning from a measure theory point of view! Thanks for your patience.

1 Answers1

0

For any continuous r.v. $X$ we have $P(X=t)=0$ so $P(X \neq t)=1-0=1$.

If $X_s=Y_s$ for all $s$ then $X_T=Y_T$ which gives $0=1$. Hence the event $(X_s=Y_s\, \forall s \geq 0)$ is empty.