Problem: Describe the locus $\mathcal{L}$ determined by the equation $$z(\overline{z}+2)=3, z \in \mathbb{C}.$$
My argument: Let $z=x+iy$. We compute as follows:
$$(x+iy)(x-iy+2)=3;$$ $$(x^2+2x+y^2)+(2y)i=3;$$
equaling the real and imaginary parts, we get the system of equations \begin{cases} x^2+2x+y^2=3\\ 2y=0 \end{cases}
Solving it, I conclude that $\mathcal{L}=\{(-3,0),(1,0)\}$.
Person B's argument: By completing squares in the equation $$(x^2+2x+y^2)+(2y)i=3$$ they get $$(x+1)^2+(y+i)^2=3.$$ Person B's conclusion: the locus is the circumference with center $(-1, -i)$ and radius 3^(1/2).
Now, I don't even understand what their conclusion means. How can a circumference in $\mathbb{R}^2$ (which is isomorphic to $\mathbb{C}$) have the point $(-1, -i) \in \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{C}$ as its center? Person B argued that "since we are working with complex numbers we can work with complex coordinates", but for me this as wrong as talking about a complex number with real or imaginary part being a complex number as well (instead of a real number).
My question: Is Person B's argument wrong? How will you make Person B realize their mistake?