Let $(X_1, X_2,...)$ be i.i.d. random variable with finite mean $E(X)$ and let $(Y_1,Y_2,...)$ be i.i.d. with mean $E(Y)<E(X)$.
I'm wondering whether there's an $n$ such that the average $\bar{X_n}=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^nX_i$ first-order stochastically dominates the corresponding average $\bar{Y_n}$. That is, whether there is an $n$ such that $F_{\bar{Y_n}}(u)\geq F_{\bar{X_n}}(u)$ for all $u$, with strict inequality somewhere, and where $F_{\bar{Y_n}}(u)$ is the CDF of $\bar{Y_n}$ (and similar for $\bar{X_n}$).
We know from the law of large numbers that $\bar{X_n}$ and $\bar{Y_n}$ converge almost surely to $E(X)$ and $E(Y)$ respectively. This implies that they converge in distribution too. So they converge to (constant) random variables such that one (trivially) stochastically dominates the other. I'm not sure whether I can find $n$ such that $\bar{X_n}$ stochastically dominates $\bar{Y_n}$ though. It seems somewhat plausible to me that this isn't possible if $\bar{X_n}$ converges much more slowly than $\bar{Y_n}$.
If this isn't the case, what additional assumptions do I need to make it the case? By brute force computation, it seems to be true for normal distributions but I haven't managed to prove it even in this case and I'd like a much more general statement ideally. Perhaps, finite variances would help, since then they converge to $0$ as $n\rightarrow\infty$, but since the law of large numbers doesn't require finite variance, it seems weird to me that this would.
Any hints, pointers, references would be very welcome.