It is clear to me from basic calculus that differentiability is a stronger condition than continuity, hence $C^{1}\subset C^{0}$.
But, there is something that has been bothering me recently. I stumbled across the same quandary a few years back, but I can’t seem to remember how I reconciled it…
For simplicity, assume $X$ is an interval and consider the differential map $D:C^{1}(X)\rightarrow C^{0}(X)$.
Clearly D is a function since by definition, given $f\in C^{1}(X)$, it’s derivative exists and is continuous, and also any pair of continuous functions that are the derivative of the same continuously differentiable function, must be equal.
Here’s the thing that is tripping me up…
By the fundamental theorem of calculus, given any continuous function $g\in C^{0}(X)$, shouldn’t we be able to construct a continuously differentiable function in the form of its antiderivative $f(x)=\int_{a}^{x}g(u)\,du$ on any subinterval $[a,x]\subset X$ since a continuous function is Riemann integrable?
But, this would seem to imply that $D$ Is surjective, which is certainly not the case in general. Otherwise, we would have $C^{1}(X)=C^{0}(X)$, which is not true.
So, where is this line of reasoning incorrect?