I am studying the proof of the monotone class theorem in the book "Real analysis for graduate students" by Richard Bass, but I got stuck at a particular point.

The idea behind the proof is clear to me, we want to define subsets ($\mathcal{N}_i)$ of $\mathcal{M}$ that have properties of $\sigma$-Algebras and then show that these subsets ($\mathcal{N}_i)$ are actually the same as $\mathcal{M}$. This would show that the smallest monotone class that contains $A_0$ is in fact a $\sigma$-Algebra.
Now here is where I get stuck. I do not understand the claim I underlined in red.

$A_0$ is clearly a subset of $\mathcal{M}$. For each element $B_i$ in $A_0$, we know that $B_i^c$ is also in $A_0$, as $A_0$ is an algebra. But this is only for the elements IN $A_0$. How do we show that $A_0^c$ is an element in $\mathcal{M}$? (as this would imply that $A_0$ is in $\mathcal{N_1}$ by definition.)
If a sequence of sets $A_i\textuparrow A$ and each $A_i\in \mathcal{M}$, then $A\in\mathcal{M}$.
If a sequence of sets $A_i\textdownarrow A$ and each $A_i\in \mathcal{M}$, then $A\in\mathcal{M}$.
I do not see what you are trying to make figure out, it is probably something very trivial but I simply do not understand the implication as explained in my previous comment on Surb
– UpzYaDead Aug 31 '21 at 15:09