Equivalence classes are such that:
Every element is in exactly one equivalence classes. The equivalence classes together will contain every element but the classes will be disjoint. All the elements in a class will be related to each other and not be related to any element not in the class.
I won't do this excercise but suppose you had a set $W = \{a,b,c,d,e,f\}$ and and an equivalence relation $S$ and you had the following relations:
$aRa, aRc,aRd$
$bRb, bRf$
$cRa,cRc, cRd$
$dRa, dRc, dRd$
$eRe$
$fRb,fRf$
Then the elements $a,c, d$ are all related to each other but none are related to any other so
1: $\{a,c,d\}$ is one equivalence class.
$b,f$ are related to each other but not to any other elements so
2: $\{b,f\}$ is another
and $e$ is related to itself but not to any other so
3: $\{e\}$ is the third equivalence class.
Now do that for $V = \{(0,0),(0,1),(0,2),(0,3),(1,0),(1,1),(1,2),(1,3),(2,0),(2,1),(2,2),(2,3)\}$.
Find out which pairs are related to which pairs and put them into the proper sets.
....
You might ask: We had $aRa$ and $aRc$ and $aRd$ so we have to have $a,c,d$ is the same equivalence class, but who did we know we would have $cRd$? We if we had $a$ related to $c$ and $d$ but $c$ and $d$ not related to each other?
Well, this is an equivalence relation. It is transitive and it is symmetric (as well as reflexive). That means if we have $aRc$ and $aRd$ we must also have $cRa$ and $cRd$. It's because and only because the relation is equivalence that we can divide the elements into these sets of "who is related to who" so neatly and completely.
Equivalence classes in a succinct nutshell: A collection of equivalence classes is a collection of sets of all the elements that are related to each other.