0

This is not exactly a question but I want someone to confirm if my understanding of the following is correct.

The symmetric group of a set $X$ is the set of all the bijections from $X \to X$. $$S_{X}= \{\sigma: X \to X \mid \sigma \text{ is a bijection} \}$$

Question 1: I want to show the above set is a group with respect to the binary operation of composition $\circ : S_X \times S_X \to S_X$. Here is my proof.

  1. Since $\sigma_1, \sigma_2 \in S_X$ are bijections, their composition is also a bijection and hence belongs to $S_X$.
  2. Composition is associative for any triplet of functions (not necessarily bijections) so associativity holds.
  3. $\sigma_e : X \to X$ given by $\sigma_e (x) = x$ is the identity element in $S_X$.
  4. Any $\sigma \in S_X$ is bijective, hence invertible and so $\exists \ \sigma^{-1} \in S_X$ such that $\sigma \circ \sigma^{-1}= \sigma_e$

Something about point 3 and 4 doesn't feel right. What is a better way to phrase it?

Is the reasoning in my proof above correct at every step?

Question 2: I'm confused about Symmetric group vs Permutation Group. But as I understand it, a symmetric group is the set of all the bijections and permutation group is just a subgroup of symmetric group including the Symmetric group. Intuitively, a permutation group is just a collection of bijections on $X$ that form a group with $\circ$. So, one could say: There is only one symmetric group on a set while there could be multiple permutation groups on the same set. Is my understanding correct?

For example: $P = \{\pi : ℝ \to ℝ \mid \pi(x) = x+a, \ \forall a \in ℝ \} $ is set of all translations (as well as bijections) is the Permutation group on $\mathbb{R}$ but $P≠S_{ ℝ}$. $P$ is just the group $(ℝ, +)$.

William
  • 4,893
  • Q1: Yes. Q2: For $X={1,2,\ldots ,n}$ we have ${\rm Sym}(X)=S_n$, the symmetric group of permutations. Q3: Regarding the name symmetric group see this duplicate. – Dietrich Burde Oct 19 '21 at 09:26
  • @DietrichBurde I'm sorry, I do not understand your reply to my question 2. Could you elaborate. Sure for $X={1,2, \ldots, n }, S_X = S_n$ is the symmetric group of permutations what does that have to with question 2? – William Oct 19 '21 at 09:33
  • @DietrichBurde I've also slightly edited question 1 asking for a better way to phrase the points 3 and 4, if you could take a look at that as well. – William Oct 19 '21 at 09:34
  • For question $2$, I understand the symmetric group $S_n$. It consists of all permutations that can be performed on the $n$ symbols. So what is the difference to your "permutation group"? What do you mean by this? – Dietrich Burde Oct 19 '21 at 09:41
  • Perhaps wikipedia is helpful. For finite sets, "permutations" and "bijective functions" refer to the same operation, namely rearrangement. – Dietrich Burde Oct 19 '21 at 09:48
  • @DietrichBurde Are you asking me what a permutation group is? I've also updated my question 2 with an example, does that help? Or are you asking something entirely else? – William Oct 19 '21 at 09:48
  • Yes, indeed, this was my question. In your link you have also your answer. A permutation group then is a subgroup of the symmetric group. Every finite group is a subgroup of some $S_n$. – Dietrich Burde Oct 19 '21 at 09:50
  • Please ask one question at a time. – Shaun Oct 19 '21 at 09:51
  • @Shaun Okay. I've deleted question 3. Question 1 isn't a question. It's just prove verification. 1 and 2 are both "Yes" or "No" questions. – William Oct 19 '21 at 09:53
  • @DietrichBurde I see the confusion. I'm not asking a query in question 2. I'm actually saying if whatever I've written in question 2 is correct? I'm asking for confirmation. If my understanding is correct or not. Sorry for the confusion. I don't think naming it "question" 1 or 2 was correct since I'm not actually querying. I'm looking for a confirmation like "yes" or "no" or some thoughts on improving it. – William Oct 19 '21 at 09:57
  • 1
    I am not really sure what the problem is here. The answer to Question 2 is yes, your understanding is correct. – Derek Holt Oct 19 '21 at 10:12
  • @DerekHolt Thanks. English isn't my first language so I was trying to make sure if I'm not misunderstanding anything. Is my example in question 2 correct? The reason I ask this is because though $(P, \circ) = (ℝ, +)$, the more I think, I'm not sure if $(P, \circ)= S_{ℝ}$ or not. At first I thought they weren't. But now I'm not sure. Do they have the same cardinalities or something? Idk. – William Oct 19 '21 at 10:19
  • A side comment on your Question 1. Hystorically, things went the other way around: the definition of abstract group is precisely patterned upon the properties 1 to 4 fulfillled by the set of all the bijections on a given set $X$. So the answer is (tautogically) yes, as your $S_X$ is the "prototypical" abstract group. –  Oct 19 '21 at 10:58
  • @DerekHolt Nevermind I figured it out. $|S_{ℝ}|>|ℝ|=|P|$ so there cannot be a bijection – William Oct 19 '21 at 11:09

0 Answers0