1

Find the polynomials $P \in \Bbb{R}[X]$ so that $(X+4) P(X)=X P(X+1)$.

I haven't gotten very far:

$$(0+4)P(0)=0P(0+1) \iff P(0)=0$$

Through $P(0)=0$, we can derive $P(-1)=0$:

$$(-1+4)P(-1)=-1P(-1+1)=-P(0)=0 \iff P(-1)=0,$$

also $P(-2)=0$ and $P(-3)=0$.

What do I do now?

Theo Bendit
  • 50,900

2 Answers2

3

I think you're most of the way there. Factor theorem tells us that $X(X + 1)(X + 2)(X + 3)$ is a factor of your polynomial, that is, $$P(X) = X(X + 1)(X + 2)(X + 3)Q(X) \tag{$\star$}$$ for some polynomial $Q \in \Bbb{R}[X]$. We need to know which of these polynomials are solutions. Maybe we will find that all such polynomials are solutions, in which case, $(\star)$ is our final answer!

So, let's suppose that $P(X)$ takes the form $(\star)$. Then $$(X + 4)P(X) = X(X + 1)(X + 2)(X + 3)(X + 4)Q(X)$$ and $$XP(X + 1) = X(X + 1)(X + 2)(X + 3)(X + 4)Q(X + 1).$$ The only way these could be equal is if $Q(X) = Q(X + 1)$. But, the only way this could possibly happen is if $Q$ is constant (this would imply $Q$ is periodic, hence bounded, hence constant). So, our refined form of $(\star)$ is: $$P(X) = kX(X + 1)(X + 2)(X + 3),$$ for some $k \in \Bbb{R}$, and the above working (substituting $Q(X) = k$) shows that all such $P$ work. Thus, this is the general solution.

Theo Bendit
  • 50,900
  • Have you seen my "answer" ? – Jean Marie Nov 19 '21 at 23:59
  • @JeanMarie I have now, but I don't understand the need for "scare quotes". It seems like a perfectly fine answer, especially when complementing my usage of this method to this particular question. I'd give it a +1 if you hadn't so explicitly requested I didn't. (If you don't want reputation, have you considered making it community Wiki?) – Theo Bendit Nov 20 '21 at 00:06
  • Thanks. I don't know the procedure for making an answer a community Wiki answer. Can you give me a reference ? – Jean Marie Nov 20 '21 at 00:09
  • @JeanMarie If you press edit, then below the text box, on the right, there is a checkbox marked "Community Wiki". If you press it, you'll get a warning about how difficult the process is to reverse (requires moderator intervention), but if you're sure, then there's no issue. I found a page about community wiki on meta, but the instructions don't seem to be any more clear than the ones I've just given. – Theo Bendit Nov 20 '21 at 00:15
  • Thank you very much. – Jean Marie Nov 20 '21 at 09:14
0

$\require{cancel}$

An adaptation of an excellent solution to the more general problem of finding polynomial solutions to

$$xP(x-a)=(x-b)P(x) \ \ \text{for} \ \ a,b \in \mathbb Z, \ a \ne b \tag{1}$$

(here with $a=-1, b=-4$).

Indeed such issues appear rather often on Math Stack Exchange (Calculation of polynomial $g(x)$ satisfies $x\cdot g(x+1)=(x-3)\cdot g(x)$),(Find all polynomials $p(x)$ such that: $xp(x-1) = (x-30)p(x)$), (Determine the polynomials $p(x)$ satisfying $x\cdot p(x-1) = (x-26)\cdot p(x)$), etc. and artof problemsolving for particular cases of $a$ and $b$.

I found question (1) and its solution by a certain bobthesmarty here.

Here is an adapted form of this solution where the central issue is the relationship $b=ka$ with $k>0$ for having nonzero solutions.

Let us consider first the special case $a=0$ for which clearly the only solution is $P(x)=0$.

Let us assume for the following that $a \ne 0$.

Plug in $x=0$ in (1) to get $P(0)=0$, so $x|P(x)$. Therefore, there exists $P_1(x)$ such that $P(x):=xP_1(x)$.

(1) becomes:

$$\cancel{x}(x-a)P_1(x-a)=(x-b)\cancel{x}P_1(x)\tag{2}$$

Plugging $x=a$ in (2) gives $P_1(a)=0$ ; so $(x-a) | P_1(x)$

Therefore: $P_1(x)=(x-a)P_2(x)$ for a certain $P_2(x)$.

In this way, (2) becomes

$$\cancel{(x-a)}(x-2a)P_2(x-a)=(x-b)\cancel{(x-a)}P_2(x)\tag{3}$$

Continuing this process, we will accumulate roots $0,a,2a,\cdots$ with (generalizing (2) and (3)) a polynomial $P_k$ such that:

$$(x-ka)P_k(x-a)=(x-b)P_k(x)\tag{4}$$

Does this process stops ?

  • Either $ka$ (for $k$ positive) is never equal to $b$, meaning that $b$ is not a multiple of $a$ ; if such is the case, we will get an infinity of roots, which is impossible for a polynomial.

  • Or $b=ka$ for a certain value of $k$. In this case, (3) becomes

$$P_k(x-a)=P_k(x) \tag{5}$$

As a polynomial cannot be periodic, the consequence of (5) is that $P_k(x)=c$ for a certain constant $c$.

Substituting in a reverse order, we get the general solution of (1):

$$\text{If} \ b=ka, \ \text{then} \ \ \boxed{P(x)=cx(x-a)(x-2a)\cdots(x-(k-1)a)}$$

Jean Marie
  • 81,803