I am studying this paper about logistic regression. In section 4.2 (Randomly Generated Problems) on page 1534, they say "Features of positive (negative) examples are independent and identically distributed, drawn from a normal distribution $\mathcal{N}(\nu,1)$, where $\nu$ is in turn drawn from a uniform distribution on $[0,1]$ $([−1,0])$."
Question1:
Why all entries of positive(negative) examples are drawn from the same distribution? More clearly, let $x\in \mathbb{R}^n$ be an example vector whose label is positive. Then all entries of $x$ are coming from a ball centered at $[\nu, \dots, \nu]^{\top}$ whose radius is roughly 1 because the variance is 1. Similarly, for an example vector whose label is negative all entries of $x$ are coming from a ball centered at $[-\nu, \dots, -\nu]^{\top}$ whose radius is roughly 1 because the variance is 1. Am I understand this correctly? The following is the picture of these balls when the standard deviation is 0.1. If we let the standard deviation be 1 they are overlapped.

My thoughts: With the above set up we have two balls one in non-negative orthant and the other in non-positive orthant. Clearly, we can find a hyperplane that can separate them. This makes finding the separating hyperplane easy. We can have our two balls of data at any point of $\mathbb{R}^n$. To do that I have the following suggestion.
Question 2:
Isn’t it better to sample each $i$-th entry of example vectors with positive label from $\mathcal{N}(\alpha_i,1)$ and $i$-th entry of example vectors with negative label from $\mathcal{N}(\beta_i,1)$? Then the center of example vectors with positive label would be $[\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n]^{\top}$ and the center of example vectors with negative label would be $[\beta_1,\dots,\beta_n]^{\top}$. Of course, $\alpha_i$'s and $\beta_i$'s are drawn from identically and independently from $\mathcal{N}(0,1)$. The following is one realization of what I explained.


nto changerandtorandn. I think in this way there would not be any bias. Correct me if I am wrong. – Saeed Jan 11 '22 at 21:49