1

I'm not even sure if this is correct because there was no answer in the book and I'm new to proofs by induction. I'm mostly interested in feedback about the style and any proof-writing faux-pas'sss I may have made. It felt right to put the lemma up front to improve the flow of the main theorem and it possibly doesn't need to be proven, but I did so because I was advised you should write everything you need to to convince yourself in the early stages. Thanks

So I have to prove that $n(n^2 +5)$ is divisible by $6$ for all $n >=1$, but I start with a lemma I use later.

Lemma 1: $n^2 + n$ is even for all $n \in Z$.

Proof: Assume $n$ is even, then $n = 2m$ for some $m \in Z$, and:

$$n^2 + n = (2m)^2 + 2m = $$ $$ 4m^2 + 2m = $$ $$ 2(2m^2 + m) =$$

$$ n^2 + n = 2k$$ for some integer $k$.

If $n$ is even, then $(n^2 + n)$ is also even.

Assume $n$ is odd and let $n = 2m -1$ for some $m \in Z$.

Thus, $$n^2 + n = (2m -1)^2 + (2m -1)=$$ $$4m^2 - 4m +1 + 2m - 1 =$$ $$4m^2 - 2m =2(2m^2 -1) = 2k$$ for some integer $k$ and again we find: $$n^2 + n = 2k$$

Thus, $n^2 + n$ is even when $n$ is odd or even, proving $n^2 + n$ is even for all $n \in Z$.

Theorem: $n(n^2 + 5)$ is divisible by 6 for all integers $n>=1 $.

Proof: By induction. Let $ A(n) = n(n^2 +5)$ and so:

$$A(1) = 1(1^2 + 5) = 6 = 6 \cdot 1$$

By assumption, $A(n) = 6k$ for some $k \in Z$:

$$ n(n^2 + 5) = (n^3 + 5n) = 6k $$

It suffices to show that $A(n+1) = 6r$ for some $r \in Z$:

$$A(n+1) = (n+1)[(n+1)^2 + 5]= $$ $$ (n+1)^3 + 5(n+1) =$$

$$ n^3 + 3n^2 + 8n + 6=$$ $$ n^3 + 3n^2 + (5n + 3n) + 6=$$ $$ (n^3 + 5n) + 3n^2 + 3n + 6=$$

By assumption, $A(n) = (n^3 +5n) = 6k$ for some $k \in Z$ we have:

$$ 6k + 3n^2 +3n + 6 =$$ $$ 6k + 3(n^2 + n) + 6 =$$ By Lemma 1, we let $(n^2 +n) = 2j$ for some positive integer $j$: $$ 6k + 3(2j) + 6 =$$ $$ 6k + 6j + 6 = $$ $$ 6(k + j + 1)$$ Let $ k + j + 1 = r$, then we have:

$$A(n+1) = 6r$$ Thus proving $A(1)$ is divisible by 6 and that if $A(n)$ is divisible by 6, then $A(n+1)$ is also divisible by 6.

  • 1
    You can reduce a bit the length of your proof (which seems fine). Also your formatting of equations is not so good, it is a bit tedious to read. – F_M_ Jan 27 '22 at 13:15
  • 1
    There are too many equal signs as well. – F_M_ Jan 27 '22 at 13:21
  • Thanks a lot for looking over it! I suspected there might have been a simpler way. Can you be specific about the formatting? ( ah okay I see you mentioned equals signs). I should cut out more intermediary / obvious steps too? – user2170751 Jan 27 '22 at 13:22
  • 1
    I can make an edit to your post if you wish? – F_M_ Jan 27 '22 at 13:23
  • Yes thanks a lot – user2170751 Jan 27 '22 at 13:26
  • 1
    In my opinion, the question that you posed is very complicated, and (in part) depends on the target audience. Most Math text books island hop. This means that they jump from one (true and valid) assertion to another. This makes their text (somewhat) easier to digest. However, it typically requires that the Math student periodically stop reading, and verify on scratch paper that the current island hop is valid. This can be taxing. So, the juggling act is to compromise between fewer island hops, and being less long-winded. – user2661923 Jan 27 '22 at 13:27
  • 1
    I was thinking the target audience is essentially people like me new to mathematical proofs and not very advanced in mathematical knowledge generally, it should be sufficient to satisfy people like me. That being the case I thought to include as much explicitly as possible, understanding that if I were working at a higher level it likely wouldn't require a lot of it. For example, I had to convince myself that n^2 + n is even. – user2170751 Jan 27 '22 at 13:32
  • 1
    An easier way to prove your lemma: $n^2+n=n(n+1)$ which is even as one of two consecutive numbers is even – Vasili Jan 27 '22 at 13:34
  • Ah, nice one, didn't spot that! – user2170751 Jan 27 '22 at 13:36
  • @user2661923 I googled "island hopping mathematics OR textbooks" but couldn't find example usages? – ryang Jan 27 '22 at 14:13
  • @ryang Island hopping is a term that I coined to emphasize that it is a common practice among Math authors to require that the reader periodically stop reading, and verify assertions on scratch paper. Some readers, who are more knowledgeable won't have to do this that much, and other readers will have to do it often. I (very subjectively) usually regard forcing the reader to periodically scratch-paper-verify as a defect of the writing. On the other hand, more knowledgeable readers will often prefer that the writing be less long-winded. – user2661923 Jan 27 '22 at 14:51
  • @user2661923 I know what you meant. Because you boldfaced it, I thought it might be a standard term in the literature, so was checking that. Good coinage! – ryang Jan 27 '22 at 14:53

2 Answers2

2

I passed over your proof, and the most important thing is it's correctness. Well done!

Second point is the clarity of your claims and the nice flow. There is a proving approach called "top-down", which means that you state lemmas wherever needed, but the proof of the lemmas should appear after the claim that demands them (kind of hierarchical order of proof). For example, in your case the proof of the lemma should have appeared in the end. Disclaimer: I don't advocate the top-down or bottom-up forms, rather whatever seems to me the most convenient for a reader to go through, while keeping in mind all relevant issues all along the reading. In particular, I'd prefer the same order as yours in this case.

Third, you've used "summary sentences" several times. For instance, "Thus, $n^2+n$ is even when $n$ is odd or even, proving $n^2+n$ is even for all $n \in Z$". Mostly, this kind of sentences do not appear in a proof unless needed for simplifying the process of the proof and focusing the reader to the main issues. You'll gather intuition by the time whether writing such sentences or not, just keep this point in mind.

Completing the previous point, when you try to prove anything, you don't need to state that the claim was proven. I imply to the last sentence ("thus proving..."). When you showed that the inductive step is correct, you are done.

A little advise: if your main goal is learning how to prove, try start with (naive) set theory. Anyway, do whatever you enjoy the most.

Let me sum up please. Your proof is clean and neat, and as you go along with your studies, you'll figure out what parts are more essential and which parts may be omitted. Anyways, it's better to elaborate more than needed as a beginning, as you've just done.

I hope it was helpful, and sorry for grammatical mistakes if any (I am not a native English speaker). Good luck!

1

Instead of editing I decided to make an answer, so you could compare better. In companion to the previous answers and comments, here is a shortened version of the results. Of course, a lot is personal taste how to write things down and you will learn a lot along the way.

Lemma 1. $n^2 + n$ is even for all $n \in \mathbb{Z}.$

Proof: As either $n$ or $n+1$ is even, it follows that $n^2+n = n(n+1)$ is even.

Theorem. $n(n^2 + 5)$ is divisible by 6 for all integers $n\geq 1 $.

Proof: Let $ A(n) = n(n^2 +5).$ We proceed by induction. Notice that $A(1)=6,$ this shows the induction base. Now assume that $A(n)$ is divisible by $6$ and consider \begin{align*} A(n+1) &= n^3 + 2n^2+6n+n^2+6 \\ &= (n^3+5n) + 3(n^2+n) +6\\ &= A(n) + 3(n^2+n) +6. \end{align*} The first and the second term are divisible by $6$ by the assumption and the lemma respectively, hence $A(n+1)$ is divisible by $6.$

F_M_
  • 828
  • 3
  • 7
  • 1
    You can try to do a proof without induction as well by looking at $n(n^2+5)$ modulo $6.$ – F_M_ Jan 27 '22 at 13:49
  • Oh wow, that is short. I appreciate you taking the time. As mentioned, I hadn't thought about the product of two consecutive numbers being even (hopefully because I wasn't focused on that part :P). But it really gives me an idea of what the optimum might look like, especially the last line of the equation. I was considering using the modulo thing but because it was from a section on induction I knew it was meant to be done that way. Will try the modulo version next – user2170751 Jan 27 '22 at 13:53