I have encountered a somewhat odd notation for a derivative, and I can't seem to work it out. I was given that...
$d(u^3v) = 3u^2vdu + u^3dv$
which sure, makes sense, however, If I now integrate both sides...
$\int{d(u^3v)} = 3v\int u^2du + u^3 \int dv $
I get that
$u^3v = 3v\frac{u^3}{3} + u^3v = 2u^3v$
which seems to have doubled the original function. This "effect" seems to happen depending on how many functions I have in the d() notation. As another example...
$d(u^3v^4w^5) = v^4w^5 (3u^2)du + u^3w^5 (4v^3) dv + u^3v^4 (5w^4)dw$
...which then integrates back to
$u^3v^4w^5 = 3u^3v^4w^5$
I am sure I am misunderstanding this notation somehow because I can clearly see for example in the single variable case, that...
$d(cos(\theta)) = -sin(\theta)d\theta$
because I can also write it as:
$\frac{d}{d\theta}\left(\cos(\theta)\right) = - \sin(\theta)$
Can anyone help me understand what I am doing wrong here? This notation seems to be appearing more frequently in my studies and it has seemingly come out of nowhere. Thank you in advance!
$d(u^3v)$ were not functions of any other variable. So
$\frac{du}{dt} = 0$,
but
$\frac{d}{du}(u^3) = 3u^2$
I am really just confused how the notation is working and why I can not recover the function upon integrating.
– BoozyBear Feb 03 '22 at 20:34