Someone asked me about the following exercise and I tried my best to help them but couldn't understand this. Given:
$$f(x) = \int_2^{-x+3} e^{t^2} dt$$
According to wolframalpha, the derivative is:
$$f'(x) = -e^{(3-x)^2}$$
But I cannot for the life of me figure out where the negation is coming from. I kinda understand that: $$F'(x) = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left( \int_a^{x} f(t) dt \right) = f(x)$$
So according to that, if I put $-x+3$ for that x, I'd expect to get $f'(x)=e^{(3-x)^2}$.
What exactly am I missing? I'm sure it's something trivial, but I just can't figure it out and googling didn't help a bit.
\partialinstead of\delta. Please compare rendering\delta / \delta x→ $\delta / \delta x$ to\partial / \partial x→ $\partial / \partial x$. – CiaPan Feb 15 '22 at 20:19