0

My guess is that I must prove that $A \times \mathbb{R}^m$ has measure zero in $\mathbb{R}^n \times \mathbb{R}^m$.

Now, knowing that f is continuous on A, whatever succesion $\{x_n\} \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ s.t. $\{x_n\} \to x \implies f(\{x_n\}) \to f(x)$ (i.e.: $f(x_n) \subset \mathbb{R}^m$).

Can we take $C_n = \{(x_n,f(x_n)\} \subset \mathbb{R}^n\times \mathbb{R}^m$ as a cover for $A \times \mathbb{R}^m$? Can I prove that $\sum vol(C_i) < \varepsilon$?

Thank you

  • I'd look at proving that some small neighborhood of a point on the graph has measure zero, and then use the fact that a countable union of measure-zero sets has measure zero. – Dennis Mar 09 '22 at 01:20
  • Not sure about this measure zero thing, there are continuous functions mapping unit segment to unit square in $R^2$ so called Peanno Curve. – Salcio Mar 09 '22 at 02:40
  • The term "Lebesgue Measure Zero" refers to a collection of sets X that have a numerable covering and whose "volume" is less than a certain, arbitrary $\varepsilon>0$ – Eduardo V. Kuri Mar 09 '22 at 22:22

1 Answers1

2

Be careful! The graph of $f$ is not $A \times \mathbb{R}^m$ in general. You might be saying that the graph is contained in this set, so if we can show $A \times \mathbb{R}^m$ is null, then the graph must be too, but this might be false! As a cute exercise, you might try to show this, but I'll leave a big hint below the fold:

Consider any $f : [0,1] \to \mathbb{R}^2$. Then you're suggesting we consider the set $[0,1] \times \mathbb{R}^2 \subseteq \mathbb{R}^3$. Can you show this set has infinite measure?

As is mentioned in the comments, we also can't rely on the image of $f$ being small! After all, there are continuous injective functions from $\mathbb{R}^1 \to \mathbb{R}^2$ whose images have positive measure! See here, for instance.

So then we'll have to use some special property of the graph. One that comes to mind is that it's "sparse" in the sense that, for a fixed $x \in A$, there is exactly one $y$ so that $(a,y)$ is in the graph. We can leverage this, and let's see how:


Let $\Gamma = \{ (a,f(a)) \mid a \in A \}$ be the graph of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}^m$ for $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$. Moreover, let $\chi_\Gamma$ be the characteristic function of $\Gamma$.

Then if $\mu^d$ is the $d$-dimensional lebesgue measure, we have:

$$ \begin{align} \mu^{m+n} \Gamma &= \int \chi_\Gamma \ d \mu^{m+n} \\ &= \int \chi_\Gamma \ d (\mu^m \times \mu^n) \\ &\overset{(1)}{=} \int \left ( \int \chi_\Gamma(x,y) \ d \mu^n(y) \right )\ d \mu^m(x) \\ &\overset{(2)}{=} \int \mu^n(\{f(x)\}) \ d\mu^m(x) \\ &= \int 0 \ d \mu^m(x) \\ &= 0 \end{align} $$

where in step $(1)$ we've applied (the unsigned version of) Fubini's Theorem, and in step $(2)$ we've evaluated the inner integral. We're thinking of $\chi_\Gamma(x,y)$ as a function of $y$ with fixed $x$. But this is where we use the "sparseness" I alluded to earlier! For fixed $x$ there's exactly one choice of $y$ for which $\chi_\Gamma(x,y) \neq 0$: namely $y = f(x)$. So this integral evaluates to the measure of $\{ f(x) \}$, which is (of course) $0$.


I hope this helps ^_^

HallaSurvivor
  • 38,115
  • 4
  • 46
  • 87
  • 1
    Nice answer! By the way, you are only using that the function is measurable, not continuous, right? – Richard Jensen Mar 09 '22 at 10:50
  • 1
    @RichardJensen. That's right. Any measurable function should do. There might be some subtleties about the $m+n$-dimensional lebesgue algebra not being the same as the product algebra of the $m$ and $n$ dimensional ones, (the issue is only a matter of nullsets), so let's say "borel measurable" to be safe – HallaSurvivor Mar 09 '22 at 19:53
  • I'm checking this out with some friends and those were the same insights I received! Thank you so much :3. My new idea is: Showing a particular coordinate function $f_i \subseteq \mathbb{R}^m$ is M. Zero, and then looking if the cartesian products of all f is – Eduardo V. Kuri Mar 09 '22 at 22:05
  • Hi! I'm reading into the aid you gave me, and I have a question:

    When you wrote "This integral evaluates to the measure of ${f(x)}$, which is zero", does that mean the measure of the image of an m-dimensional function is zero?

    – Eduardo V. Kuri Mar 11 '22 at 15:59
  • No. There are continuous injective functions from a low dimension space to a high dimension space whose images have positive measure – HallaSurvivor Mar 11 '22 at 18:17