I'm not sure how to think about the relationship between the statements
any input is LOW;
no inputs are HIGH; and
the output of an AND gate is LOW.
The context is my textbook, the 11th edition of Digital Fundamentals by Thomas Floyd, which asks
The output of an AND gate is LOW when
(a) any input is LOW (b) all inputs are HIGH (c) no inputs are HIGH (d) Both (a) and (c)
and gives as the answer
(a)
I'm trying to think more logically and was hoping for some input.
First off, I understand r when s $\equiv $ if $s$, then $r$.
Let $$ q: \text{the output of an AND gate is LOW} \\ a: \text{any input is LOW} \\ c: \text{no inputs are HIGH} $$
Since the answer is $ (a) $, is it correct to express the idea as $ a \to q $?
Would it also be correct to observe that any time $c$ is true $a$ must also be true, and to express this relationship as $ c \to a $? By transitivity, doesn't that suggest $ c \to q$ as an answer also?
Yet $\neg(a \to c)$ because $a$ is a more restrictive condition than $c$. After all, the output of an AND gate can be LOW when $ a \land \neg c $ is true. So I'm not wanting to say that $ a \land c \to q$, even though $a \to q$ and $c \to q$.
I'm thinking that if the task is to select all propositions for which the if-then relationship is true, I want to select $a$ and $c$ but not $a \land c$ because $a \to q$ and $a \to q$ are true whereas $a \land c \to $q is not.
On the other hand, if the task is to select the proposition, $p$, that is always true whenever $q$ is true as well as sufficient for $q$, I'm thinking I want to select $a \to q$ because $q \to a$.
Since the answer is $(a)$, am I right to say that the spirit of the question is to identify which proposition, $p$, satisfies $p \iff $q? Only $p = a$ does.