I am trying to solve the below problem.
Suppose that five $1$s and four $0$s are arranged around a circle. Form a new circle by placing a $0$ between any two unequal adjacent numbers and a $1$ between any two equal values before then erasing the original values. Show that, no matter how many times you repeat this and no matter what the initial configuration is, you will never get a circle of all $0$s.
Below is my attempt.
Fix an initial configuration on the circle arranged around the circle in a counterclockwise manner beginning at the ``12:00'' position. If it were possible to construct a new circle of all $0$s, it must be the case that the configuration of the original circle alternated fully. However, if the configuration began with a $0$, it cannot alternate fully because $9$ is odd and therefore we have an uneven number of $1$s and $0$s. Indeed, if we attempt to alternate fully upon beginning with a $1$, the best we can do is $101010101$, though our first and last elements of the configuration are $1$s. Alternatively, if we began with a $0$, the best we can do is $010101011$ since we have only four $0$s to work with. In either case, we cannot fully alternate $0$s and $1$s in our initial arrangement, so there is no way to create a new circle composed entirely of $0$s.
What I think I want to say is that $9$ is odd, so there are an uneven number of $0$s and $1$s so any attempt will fail. I'm not sure if the language I used to the effect of "the best we can do" makes total sense, because I could have a repeat somewhere else. What I was trying to say was, let's fix a starting point and attempt to create a circle that fully alternates, and no matter whether that start is a $0$ or a $1$, we eventually run into the issue of a repeat somewhere, particularly a repeated $1$. I'm not sure if it's a repeated $1$ in every case, but I expect that to be the case.
Is there a "more general" argument for this? Especially since the problem says "no matter what the initial configuration is," I think the argument I presented is too hand-wavy and not general enough.