7

I'm studying differential topology by myself by reading Guillemin and Pollack's book and I encountered the following problem (Exercise 12 in Chapter 2.3):

Given $Z \subset Y \subset \mathbb{R}^M$, we consider the normal bundle to $Z$ in $Y$ defined as follows: $$N(Z;Y) := \{(z,v): z \in Z, v \in T_{z}(Y) \text{ and } v \perp T_{z}(Z)\}$$ Show that the normal bundle $N(Z;Y)$ is a manifold with the same dimension as $Y$.

I have tried following the given hints to use Exercise 1.4.4 and proof of the Proposition on page 71 of the book. This gives us a parametrization $\phi: U \times \mathbb{R}^{l} \rightarrow N(Z;\mathbb{R}^{M}) = N(Z)$, which implies that the normal bundle $N(Z)$ is a manifold. However, I have been stuck on showing that this parametrization restricts to a parametrization $U \times \mathbb{R}^k \rightarrow N(Z;Y)$, which is suggested by the hint...

I have been thinking about this problem for almost a month without any significant progress, so any help/hints would be appreciated! Thank you so much in advance! Also, a post on the same question: Normal bundle to $Z$ in $Y$ is a manifold with same dimension as $Y$ (Exercise 2.3.12 of Guillemin-Pollack) (Though unfortunately there's no answer in this post...)

In addition, I have attached three images of the book below, just in case that they might be useful:

The problem along with the hint:

The claim proved in Exercise 1.4.4: enter image description here

Proof of the Prop on page 71: enter image description here

pureorapplied
  • 241
  • 2
  • 6
  • Have you shown that the image of the map contains vectors tangent to $Y$ at the appropriate point? That should do it. – Ted Shifrin Apr 28 '22 at 04:26
  • Hi Ted, thanks for your comment! This is exactly the part that confuses me... FYI, I have been considering the map $$\psi: U \times \mathbb{R}^{k} \rightarrow N(U)$$ given in the proof. I want to show that when you restrict $v$ to be a vector in $\mathbb{R}^l$, you should get that $\psi(z,v)$ is in $T_{z}(Y)$...but I didn't find a way to show this – pureorapplied Apr 28 '22 at 04:50
  • To make this a bit more geometric, we're looking at the span of the gradients, $\nabla g_1(z),\dots,\nabla g_k(z)$. Recall that $T_zY$ is the orthogonal complement of the span of $\nabla g_{k+1}(z),\dots,\nabla g_\ell(z)$. There's no reason the former are in the latter, but can't you project orthogonally onto that subspace (resulting in an isomorphism)? Is the resulting vector still orthogonal to $Z$ at $z$? – Ted Shifrin Apr 28 '22 at 05:19

1 Answers1

3

When studying this theorem, I found it useful the concept of slice chart [cf. John M. Lee - Introduction to Smooth Manifolds]

Definition: A chart $\chi\colon U\to U'$ in an $n$-manifold $X$ is an $m$-slice chart for a subset $S\subseteq X$ if there exists a constant $\mathbf c\in\mathbb R^{n-m}$ and $n-m$ indexes $i_1,\dots,i_{n-m}$ such that $$ S\cap U = \{\pi\circ\chi=\mathbf c\}, $$ where $\pi$ is the projection $(x_1,\dots,x_n)\mapsto(x_{i_1},\dots,x_{i_{n-m}})$.

The relevant result here is the following

Lemma

  1. Every embedded $m$-submanifold $Y\subseteq X$ can be covered by $m$-slice charts for $Y$.

  2. Every topological subspace $Y\subseteq X$ that can be covered by $m$-slice charts for it has a smooth structure that makes it into an embedded submanifold of $X$.

Proof (sketch)

  1. Take charts $x\colon U\to U'$ and $y\colon Y\cap U\to V'$ such that, for $\bar\iota(x_1,\dots,x_m)=(x_1,\dots,x_m,0,\dots,0)$ we have

enter image description here

  1. Take an $m$-slice chart $x\colon U\to U'$ for $Y\cap U$. After reordering coordinates $$ Y\cap U = \{\pi\circ x=\mathbf c\}, $$ where $\pi(x_1,\dots,x_n)=(x_{m+1},\dots,x_n)$. Let $\bar\pi(x_1,\dots,x_n)=(x_1,\dots,x_m)$ be the complementary projection. Then, for $y=\bar\pi\circ x\circ\iota$ and $\jmath\colon(x_1,\dots,x_m)\mapsto(x_1,\dots,x_m,c_1,\dots,c_{n-m})$, we can use the following diagram to verify that (1) $y$ is a bijection and (2) any transition between two of these bijections is smooth.

enter image description here


Theorem. If $X$ is an $m$-submanifold embedded in $\mathbb R^n$, its normal bundle $\mathbf N(X)$ has a structure of $n$-submanifold embedded in $\mathbb R^{2n}$.

Proof (sketch)

By definition $\mathbf N(X)$ is a topological subspace of $X\times\mathbb R^n$. Therefore, it is enough to show that $\mathbf N(X)$ can be covered with $m$-slice charts. The idea is to take a slice chart $\chi\colon U\to U'$ for $X$ and produce a slice chart for $\mathbf N(X)$.

We may assume that $U\cap X=\{\pi\circ\chi=\mathbf0\}$. Put $\varphi=\pi\circ\chi$. Then $d\varphi(p)\colon\mathbb R^n\to\mathbb R^{n-m}$ satisfies $$ \textrm{im}(d\varphi(p)^T)=T_p(X)^\perp\tag1 $$ To see this observe that $T_p(X)=\ker(d\varphi(p))$ because $\subseteq$ + $=$ dim. Then $d\varphi(p)^T$ is mono with image $T_p(X)^\perp$, again $\subseteq$ + $=$ dim.

Next observe that $$ d\varphi(p)^T = d\chi(p)^T\circ\iota,\tag2 $$ where $\iota(z_{m+1},\dots,z_n)=(0,\dots,0,z_{m+1},\dots, z_n)$ is the transpose of $\pi$.

We can now prove that \begin{align*} \Phi\colon U\times\mathbb R^n&\to U'\times\mathbb R^n\\ (p,\mathbf w)&\mapsto(\chi(p),(d\chi(p)^T)^{-1}(\mathbf w)). \end{align*} defines an $n$-slice chart for $\mathbf N(U\cap X)=\mathbf N(X)\cap U\times\mathbb R^n$.

To see this observe, using $(1)$, that $$ (p,\mathbf w)\in \mathbf N(U\cap X)\iff \chi(p)\in\{\bar\pi=\mathbf0\} \textrm{ and }\mathbf w\in\textrm{im}(d\varphi(p)^T),\tag3 $$ where $\bar\pi\colon U'\to\pi(U')\subseteq\pi\colon(x_1,\dots,x_n)\mapsto(x_{m+1},\dots,x_n)$.

Therefore, for $(q,\mathbf v)=\Phi(p,\mathbf w)$, we have $q=\chi(p)$ and $d\chi(p)^T(\mathbf v)=\mathbf w$. Then \begin{align*} (q,\mathbf v)\in\Phi(\mathbf N(U\cap X)) &\iff (p,\mathbf w)\in \mathbf N(U\cap X)\\ &\iff \chi(p)\in\{\bar\pi=\mathbf0\} \textrm{ and }\mathbf w\in\textrm{im}(d\chi(p)^T\circ\iota) &&\textrm{; by }(2)\textrm{ and }(3)\\ &\iff q\in\{\pi=\mathbf0\}\cap U'\textrm{ and }\mathbf v\in\textrm{im}(\iota), \end{align*} which completes the proof because $$ 2n-\dim\{\pi=0\}-\dim\textrm{im}(\iota)= 2n - m - (n-m) = n. $$