I was reading Ivan Niven's Maxima and Minima without calculus - more precisely the section regarding the Jeep crossing the Desert but that's not the point.
In that section is given an "almost self-evident lemma" which I understand but I can't see how I could prove it.
Consider a finite number of closed intervals. possibly overlapping on a straight line segment AB of length r. If each point of AB belongs to at least s of the intervals. then the sum of the lengths of the intervals is at least rs.
I think the length of AB is of no use (we can scale AB however I want) so the lemma can be rewritten as this :
Consider a finite number of closed intervals. possibly overlapping on a straight line segment AB of length 1. If each point of AB belongs to at least s of the intervals. then the sum of the lengths of the intervals is at least s.
There's a figure illustrating the lemma - and I see why it is true, but I wonder how I could prove it (which may be harder than understanding the lemma)