We know why the induction principle does not work for the statement that all horses are of the same color.
Nevertheless, in the book that I am reading there’s a statement which goes as follows: “Our argument proves that if any two horses did have the same color, then all horses would have the same color, but that result would be a horse of a different color.”
I don’t understand what is meant by the last sentence highlighted in bold, because we concluded that if the induction base was (falsely) correct, they would be all of the same color, while in the end there’s mention of a different color. What does it say?