0

This is exercise 5.29 from A Term of Commutative Algebra by A. Altman & S. Kleiman. A digital version may be found here. The statement of the exercise is the following.

Let $R$ be a ring, $X_1,X_2,\cdots$ infinitely many variables. Set $P:=R[X_1,X_2,\cdots]$ and $M:=P/\langle X_1,X_2,\cdots\rangle$. Is $M$ finitely presented? Explain.

The solution attached at the end of the book is the following.

No, otherwise by (5.18), the ideal $\langle X_1, X2, \cdots\rangle$ would be generated by some $f_1,\cdots,f_n\in P$, so also by $X_1,\cdots,X_m$ for some $m$, but plainly it isn’t.

The (5.18) in the proof above refers to the following.

Let $R$ be a ring, and $0 \rightarrow L \rightarrow R^n \rightarrow M \rightarrow 0$ an exact sequence. Prove $M$ is finitely presented if and only if $L$ is finitely generated.

However, I have the following questions:

  1. By $M$ finitely presented, does the author mean finitely presented as a module over $R$?
  2. By referring to (5.18), the author seems to be considering the following exact sequence: $$0\rightarrow \langle X_1,X_2,\cdots\rangle \rightarrow R[X_1,X_2,\cdots] \rightarrow M \rightarrow 0.$$ However, $R[X_1,X_2,\cdots]$ does not have the form $R^n$ required by (5.18).
  3. Isn't $M\cong R$ and therefore finitely presented?
Ze Chen
  • 55
  • 4

1 Answers1

3
  1. No: over $P$.
  2. $P=P^1$.
  3. Not as a $P$-module.
Anne Bauval
  • 34,650