As lulu says, the vast majority of mathematical results are not named. We only name results that we refer to a lot. So it has to be something that is not trivial to reproduce and is widely applicable to many situations.
To show this, if $\lambda$ is rational, and assuming $\lambda > 0$ (replace it by its opposite otherwise), you can choose $$\epsilon = \min\left\{\lambda, \dfrac{2-\lambda^2}{4\lambda}\right\}$$
Then $$\epsilon(2\lambda + \epsilon) < \epsilon(4\lambda) \le 2 - \lambda^2$$
$$\lambda^2 + 2\lambda\epsilon + \epsilon^2 < 2\\(\lambda + \epsilon)^2 < 2$$
If $\lambda$ is not rational, then by the Archimedean principle, there is some integer $n > \max\left\{\dfrac 1\lambda, \dfrac{4\lambda}{2-\lambda^2}\right\}$. Setting $\epsilon = \frac 1n$ gives the same inequalities as above.