0

Exercise 2/99 from 6th Ed of Meriam, Kraige - Engineering reads:

An object which is released from rest from the top $A$ of a tower of height $h$ will appear not to fall straight down due to the effect of the earth's rotation. It may be shown that the object has an eastward horizontal acceleration relative to the horizontal surface of the earth equal to $2v_y \omega cos \gamma$, where $v_y$ is the free-fall downward velocity, $\omega$ is the angular velocity of the earth, and $\gamma$ is the latitude, north or south. Determine the deflection $b$ if $h$ = 1000 ft and $\gamma$ = 30° north.

enter image description here

The exercise itself is simple. What I want to know is how to show this eastward horizontal acceleration. How does one prove it?

I tried to check it. Using spherical coordinates: enter image description here

Acceleration is

$$ \vec{a} = a_r \hat{r} + a_\phi \hat{\phi} + a_\theta \hat{\theta} $$

wherein its components are:

$$ a_r = \ddot{r} - r\dot{\theta}^2 - r\dot{\phi}^2 \cos^2 \theta $$ $$ a_\phi = r\ddot{\phi}\cos\theta + 2\dot{r}\dot{\phi}\cos\theta - 2r\dot{\phi}\dot{\theta}\sin\theta $$ $$a_\theta = r\ddot{\theta} + 2\dot{r}\dot{\theta} + r\dot{\phi}^2 \sin\theta \cos\theta$$

Now, if the object is falling relative to earth, its velocity is $\dot{r} = -v$. Earth rotation is $\dot{\phi}=\omega$ and it is constant ($\ddot{phi}=0$). Also, for a given latitude $\theta=\gamma$, $\dot{\theta}=\ddot{\theta}=0$. Also, gravitational acceleration is towards the center of the Earth, so $\ddot{r}=-g$. Substituting it in the components, we get:

$$ \vec{a} = \left(-g-r\omega^2 \cos^2 \gamma \right) \hat{r} + \left(-2 v \omega \cos \gamma\right) \hat{\phi} + \left( r \omega^2 \sin \gamma \cos \gamma \right) \hat{\theta} $$

Tangential component is $-2 v \omega \cos \gamma$, which is similar to the expected answer. However, the negative sign indicates this component is opposite to the direction of rotation of the earth, which is wrong. What I am doing wrong? How does one prove this eastward horizontal acceleration?

Thales
  • 653
  • Looks like the book is right. It is not intuitive but what I think should be considered is that the object also rotates with the earth while it rests on the tower. This component does not simply vanish during the fall. More details at the usual suspect. – Kurt G. Oct 19 '22 at 12:17
  • It appears the difference on sign is due to changing the equations of motion (EoM) to the Earth reference, which is a rotating reference frame. EoM is (Newton's 2nd law) $F=ma$, but to account for non-inertial effects, the equation considers the 'fictitious' forces $F-m d\omega/dt × r' - 2m\omega×v' - m\omega×(\omega×r') = ma'$, wherein the ' denotes quantities specified with respect to the local (rotating) reference frame. Therefore, acceleration $a'$, as perceived by an observer on Earth, is the negative of what I wrote, which gives the tangential component $2v\omega\cos\gamma$. Thanks! – Thales Oct 19 '22 at 12:28

0 Answers0