0

I was trying to understand Willard's proof (the book is called Topology) about local compacteness that any subset of a Hausdorff space is the intersection of an open set and a closed set. Then I came across this post: Locally compact subspace is an intersection of an open and closed set. But I can't prove $$(1) \quad \overline{W_x \cap \overline{M}} = \overline{W_x \cap {M}}$$ (wich is very similar to what Willard does $\overline{W_x \cap {M}} \subseteq X \implies \overline{W_x} \cap M \subseteq X$).

How does one prove $(1)$? Thank you for the help.

  • 4
    you can't prove this, because it's false - it could be that $A \cap B$ is empty and $A \cap \bar B$ is not – Matthew Towers Nov 02 '22 at 18:42
  • I found out exactly what I was looking for in @QuantumSpace 's answer in here: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3584098/a-locally-compact-and-dense-subset-of-a-hausdorff-space-is-open – Diogo Santos Nov 02 '22 at 22:30

1 Answers1

4

No. Let $A=(0,1)\cup \{2\}$, and $B=(2,3)$ then $\overline{A\cap \overline{B}}=\{2\}\ne\emptyset =\overline{A\cap B}$,

user140776
  • 1,780