$\def\O{\mathcal{O}} \def\M{\mathcal{M}} \def\N{\mathcal{N}} \def\P{\mathcal{P}} $Given a ringed space $(X,\O{_X})$, an $\O_X$-module $\P$ and $\mathcal{O}_X$-submodules $\M,\N\subset\P$ we define the module sum presheaf $\M+_p\N$ as $$ U\subset X\mapsto\M(U)+\N(U). $$ It is easy to verify that $\M+_p\N$ is a subpresheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules of $\P$. My question is: is $\M+_p\N$ a sheaf? Since it is a subpresheaf of a separated presheaf (namely, $\P$), it is separated, but when I try to check the gluing axiom, I fail. I suspect that $\M+_p\N$ is not a sheaf, but I cannot find any counterexample. I've thought of trying to recycle the counterexamples given here and here, but I think they don't work for this case.
Do you have some counterexample at hand?