I'm reading an article about automata, and I encounter this:
Let $M$ and $N$ be monoids. We say that $M$ divides $N$; and write $M < N$ , if there is a submonoid $S$ of $N$ and a morphism $\phi: S \to M$ that maps onto $M$ . Informally, $M < N$ means that $M$ is simpler than $N$ . We would naturally consider $M$ to be simpler than $N$ if $M$ is either a submonoid or a quotient of $N$ . We would also expect “simpler than” to be a transitive relation. It is easy to prove (and left as an exercise for the reader) that division is the least transitive relation that includes both the submonoid and quotient relation.
But I dont understand how can I prove that the division is the least transitive relation.Can someone explain to me how to do this?