6

One of the axioms of a t-structure in a triangulated category is that any object $X$ can be embedded inm a distingueshed triangle $$ X_0\to X\to X_1\to^+ $$ The original work by Beilinson-Bernstein-Deligne seems to suggest that this decomposition can be chosen in a functorial way, but I'm not able to deduce why it should be true: in particular I'm trying to prove [KS], Prop 10.1.4.i, where it is claimed that the inclusion ${\bf D}^\le \to \bf D$ admits a right adjoint $T^{\le 0}$, which generalizes the definition of the truncation functor in ${\bf D}=D^b(\cal A)$, the derived category of $\cal A$ with the obvious $t$-structure.

Edit: A tentative proof goes like this (it was extremely simple!): suppose you have two ways to obtain natural (in $Y\in {\bf D}^\le$) isomorphisms $$ {\bf D}^\le (Y, X_0)\cong {\bf D}(Y,X) $$ and $$ {\bf D}^\le (Y, X_0')\cong {\bf D}(Y,X) $$ Now you simply compare the isomorphism ${\bf D}^\le (Y, X_0')\cong {\bf D}(Y,X)\cong {\bf D}^\le (Y, X_0)$ and conclude by Yoneda that there must be an isomoprhism $X_0\cong X_0'$. $\blacksquare$

Can you confirm that it is right?

[KS] : P. Schapira, M. Kashiwara, Sheaves on Manifolds, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 292, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag.

fosco
  • 11,814

1 Answers1

3

Assume you have two triangles:

$A\rightarrow X\rightarrow B\rightarrow A[1]$

and

$C\rightarrow X\rightarrow D\rightarrow C[1]$

so that $A,C\in D^{\leq 0}$ and $B,D\in D^{\geq 1}$. We have a distinguished triangle

$Hom(A,D[-1])\rightarrow Hom(A,C)\rightarrow Hom(A,X)\rightarrow Hom(A,D).$

We know by definition of the t-structure that $Hom(A,D)=Hom(A,D[-1])=0$. Therefore there exist unique morphisms $A\rightarrow C$ and $B\rightarrow D$ making all squares commute. But, wait a minute. We also have unique morphisms $C\rightarrow A$ and $D\rightarrow B$. By uniqueness we obtain that these morphisms are isomorphisms.Therefore $A$ and $B$ are unique up to isomorphism.

Ok. Now we can define the right adjoint $D\rightarrow D^{\leq 0}$ by taking the unique A (up to isomorphism) in our triangles. Similarly you get right adjoints of $D\rightarrow D^{\leq n}$ using the shift operator.

Marci
  • 931
  • I can't understand which square you ask to commute. Please explain! BTW, thinking about the question for a while, I came to a proof which seems to be correct. Maybe you can confirm. – fosco Aug 17 '13 at 09:52
  • I meant that the squares AXCX and XBXD commute. – Marci Aug 17 '13 at 11:57