3

I didn't understand this part in this proof:

For me, we have to have the contrary $V(f,g)\subset V(g)$. Maybe the author made a mistake.

Thanks in advance.

user42912
  • 23,582

1 Answers1

5

Generally, yes, you have $V(f,g) \subset V(f)$ and not $V(f) \subset V(f,g)$. But here, there is a special situation:

Let $g \in I(V(f))$.

That means that $g$ vanishes on $V(f)$, or $V(f) \subset V(g)$, and hence here you have $V(f,g) = V(f)$.

Daniel Fischer
  • 206,697
  • just another question, why in the corollary $V(f)$ is irreducible? the author didn't mention this in the proof. – user42912 Aug 14 '13 at 21:16
  • 1
    I must admit that my knowledge of algebraic geometry is sparse, but iirc, the vanishing set of an irreducible polynomial is irreducible. – Daniel Fischer Aug 14 '13 at 21:19