What proposition 2 is saying, is this.
What is being said is this.
If $a \cdot x = c$, then the point defined by $x$ falls on a plane $H$.
The proof goes along the line that suppose there is a known X, where $a \cdot X = c$. Then the product $a \cdot (x - X) = c - c = 0$ means that the vector $x-X$ is at right angles to $a$, and thus makes a (hyper)plane, that passes through the point $0$. This is plane $M = H-x_1$
The addition of $X$ to any point on the hyperplane, makes a plane equidistant (at equal distance) from the hyperplane through $0$, and therefore is itself a hyperplane. This means that the set of vectors orthogonal to $a$ lie in a space one dimension less than the space that $a$ is in.
So if you find several vectors or points $x_1, x_2, \dots$, that $a \cdot x_1 = a \cdot x_2 \dots$ then these points $x_i$ lie on a common hyperplane perpendicular to the vector $a$.
In more direct terms, suppose $a = z$, the unit vector on the $z$ axis, then the dot product of $a \cdot x$ is simply the $z$ coordinate, $c$. This gives $H$.
Now, you have a vector $x_1$, which $z \cdot x_1 = c$. You get plane $M = H-x_1$ will give a set of vectors which the dot product with $z$ is $0$, so it defines a subspace where $z = 0$ always. Since this is identical to a space of one fewer axis (with $z$ removed), then it is a flat or linear subspace.
Adding back $x_1$ in it, means that $H$ is equal distance from $M$, and is thus a plane itself.