1

Prove or disprove that $\forall x {\in} \Bbb R\; \exists y {\in} \Bbb R \;\,2y^2(x-5)<1.$

Since $2y^2(x-5)<1 \Rightarrow y^2(x-5)<\frac{1}{2}.$

Take $y=\frac{1}{\sqrt {x-5}}.$

Then $\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt {x-5}}\right)^2(x-5)=1<\frac{1}{2},$ which is a contradiction.

So, the proposition $\forall x \in \Bbb R, \exists y \in \Bbb R: 2y^2(x-5)<1$ is false.

Is my reasoning correct?

ryang
  • 38,879
  • 14
  • 81
  • 179
RV math
  • 67
  • 6
  • What happens to your argument when $x=2$? – Ted Shifrin Jun 01 '23 at 00:39
  • 1
    No, that reasoning is not correct. Review the meaning of $\forall x \exists y$. – GEdgar Jun 01 '23 at 00:41
  • Could you explain me how to justify it? – RV math Jun 01 '23 at 00:47
  • You took y so that proposition is false, but the purpose here is to show that there exists y such that your inequation is true. And if you want to show that this inequation is always false, you have to show that there exists x such that for all y, 2y²(x-5) >= 1 – Adrien Portier Jun 01 '23 at 01:01
  • 3
    This is trivially true, $y=0$ works for all $x$ – Sil Jun 01 '23 at 04:31
  • Two points about your presentation: 1. "Since $2y^2(x-5)<1 \Rightarrow y^2(x-5)<\frac{1}{2}.$" $\quad$ means 'implies that', not 'therefore', so this sentence is not actually coherent. Moreover, since you are merely rewriting that inequality for easier attack later (however, here, there is no difference), is more appropriate, as it's generally invalid to argue from the conclusion. – ryang Jun 01 '23 at 04:41
  • "Then $\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt {x-5}}\right)^2(x-5)=1<\frac{1}{2},$ which is a contradiction." $\quad$ This is a confusing way to express a contradiction. Although I know what you're trying to say, techncially, you are merely unfoundedly claiming that $1<\frac12,$ then asserting that your false claim is a contradiction; this is not useful, because all we can derive is that your unfounded claim is indeed false.
  • – ryang Jun 01 '23 at 04:41