In answer to the question about the implication $({\mathscr{S}}) \Rightarrow (\star)$ :
Suppose you are given six integers $a_0,a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,a_6$. Then, there is an (obviously unique) sequence $(a_n)_{n\in{\mathbb N}}$ satisfying $(\star)$ and taking those initial values. In fact, mimicking the computation in Julian Rosen's linked answer,
we obtain
$$
\begin{array}{lcl}
a_n &=& \bigg(\frac{a_0}{3}+\frac{a_1}{2}+\frac{5a_2}{6}-\frac{a_3}{3}-\frac{a_4}{3}+\frac{a_6}{6}\bigg) \\
&=& + \bigg(-\frac{a_0}{30}-\frac{a_1}{40}-\frac{a_2}{120}+\frac{a_3}{40}+\frac{a_4}{30}+\frac{a_6}{120}\bigg) n^2 \\
&=& + \bigg(-\frac{a_0}{2}+\frac{a_1}{8}-\frac{5a_2}{8}+\frac{7a_3}{8}+\frac{a_4}{2}-\frac{3a_6}{8}\bigg) \chi_{2\mathbb Z}(n) \\
&=& + \bigg(\frac{2a_0}{3}-\frac{a_2}{3}-\frac{2a_4}{3}+\frac{a_6}{3}\bigg) \chi_{3\mathbb Z}(n) \\
&=& + \bigg(-\frac{a_1}{2}-\frac{a_2}{2}+\frac{a_3}{2}+a_4-\frac{a_6}{2}\bigg) \chi_{4\mathbb Z}(n) \\
&=& + \bigg(\frac{a_0}{5}+\frac{2a_1}{5}-\frac{a_2}{5}-\frac{2a_3}{5}-\frac{a_4}{5}+\frac{a_6}{5}\bigg) \left(\frac{n}{5}\right) \\
\end{array}
$$
Next, let $(b_n)_{n\in{\mathbb N}}$ be any sequence taking those same initial values $b_0=a_0,a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,a_6=b_6$ and satisfying $(\mathscr{S})$.
Using the first line of $(\mathscr{S})$ for $t=0$, we see that
$$
b_5=b_3+b_4-b_0=a_3+a_4-a_0=a_5
$$
Using the second line of $(\mathscr{S})$ for $t=3$, we see that
$$
b_7=2b_5-b_1=2a_5-a_1=a_7
$$
Using the first line of $(\mathscr{S})$ for $t=4$, we see that
$$
b_8=b_4+b_7-b_1=a_4+a_7-a_1=a_8
$$
Using the second line of $(\mathscr{S})$ for $t=4$, we see that
$$
b_9=b_6+b_7-b_2=a_6+a_7-a_2=a_9
$$
We have thus shown that $b_n=a_n$ for $0\leq n \leq 9$. When $n\gt 9$, $n$ can be written as $2t$ or $2t+1$ where $t\geq 5$, and for this $t$ we can remove the absolute values in $(\mathscr{S})$ : $(\mathscr{S})$ becomes
$$(\mathscr{S'}):\left\{\begin{array}{rcl}
a_{2t}&=&a_{2t-4}+a_{t+3}-a_{t-5}\\
a_{2t+1}&=&a_{2t-1}+a_{t+2}-a_{t-2}
\end{array}\right..$$
And it is clear that all those indexes on the RHS $2t-4,t+3,t-5,2t-1,t+2,t-2$ are all strictly smaller than $n$. It therefore follows by induction that $b_n=a_n$. So the two sequences $(b_n)$ and $(a_n)$ are the same, and hence $(b_n)$ satisfies $(\star)$ since $(a_n)$ does.