It is a statement that some curves can never be embedded in the plane, but only in projective 3-space. Why does the following argument not prove that every nonsingular curve can be embedded in the projective plane, though?
Let $X$ be a nonsingular complete curve over an algebraically closed field $k$, with function field $F.$ We prove that $X$ can be embedded in $\mathbb{P}^2_k.$
- $F$ has transcendence degree 1 over $k,$ and so we may find some $x \in F$ so that $F/k(x)$ is an algebraic extension. In fact, since $F$ is finite type over $k,$ $F/k(x)$ is even a finite extension.
- As $F/k(x)$ is a finite extension, and as $k(x)$ is separable, we deduce that $F/k(x)$ is a finite separable extension. The primitive element theorem then tells us that $F = k(x, y)$ for some $y \in F.$
- Let $P \in k(x)[T]$ denote the monic minimal polynomial of $y$ over $k(x).$ Then $P(y) = 0$ looks like some polynomial equation $$y^n + f_{n-1}(x)y^{n-1} + \cdots + f_0(x) = 0,$$ where each $f_i\in k(x).$ Clearing denominators, we find that there is some polynomial $Q \in k[T_1, T_2]$ so that $Q(x,y) = 0.$
- Let $X'$ denote the subscheme of $\mathbb{P}^2$ cut out by $Q$. In the standard affine chart, $X'$ looks like $\operatorname{Spec} k[T_1, T_2]/(Q).$ The fraction field of the ring $k[T_1, T_2]/(Q)$ is just $F.$
- Thus $X'$ is a projective curve with fraction field $F,$ implying it is isomorphic to $X.$
Where does this argument go wrong? I can think of two possible problems.
- In step 4, is it possible that $X'$ is a singular curve?
- Also in step 4, is it possible that $F$ is not isomorphic to the field of fractions of $k[T_1, T_2]/(Q)?$
I don't have any indication of why either 1 or 2 would fail; maybe someone could clarify if these are the problem, or if there was something else I missed?