3

I'm asked to prove that if $x\geq 0$ and $x\leq \epsilon$ for all $\epsilon >0$, then $x=0$, but I'm not sure where to go. I have that the logically equivalent statement is $$x\neq 0\implies\exists\epsilon\leq0~\text{s.t.}~x<0\lor x>\epsilon,$$ but what does this tell me?

Trancot
  • 4,021

3 Answers3

5

Hint: Suppose that $x > 0$, and consider $$\epsilon := \frac{x}{2}$$

2

There are a few techniques of proof. One of them is called proof by contradiction. Where you assume the negation, and show it is impossible (arrive at a contradiction). So in this case suppose $x \ne 0$, by assumption this means $x > 0$ now from the hint your given by T.Bongers, you should be able to arrive at a contradiction.

Keep in mind your two assumptions are $x \ge 0$ and $x \le \epsilon. $ If $\epsilon = \frac{x}{2}$ then by assumption $x \le \frac{x}{2}$ but there is only one $x$ that satisfies this inequality, if you think about what that x must be, you will see the contradiction.

user77404
  • 1,177
1

This is what I've got from what you've all said:

Assume that $x>0$, and let $\epsilon=\frac{x}{2}$, but by assumption $x\leq \epsilon$, namely $x\leq \frac{x}{2}$, but since $x>0$, then division by $x$ on both sides produces a contradiciton, namely that $1\leq \frac{1}{2}$, and so it must be true that if $x\geq 0$ and $x\leq \epsilon$ for all $\epsilon>0$, then $x=0$.

Trancot
  • 4,021
  • Yes, that is correct. But please do break it up into more than one sentence. –  Aug 25 '13 at 05:48
  • Perhaps someone wouldn't mind critiquing this. – Trancot Aug 25 '13 at 05:48
  • Oh, OK. I appreciate your help. – Trancot Aug 25 '13 at 05:49
  • You are kinda using the contrapositive, really: if $x>0$ we can find one $\epsilon >0$; namely $\epsilon =x/2 >0$ (or really $x/\alpha$ for any $\alpha >1$ you like) such that $$0<\frac x 2 <x $$ Thus you have proven that $x\leq \epsilon$ for each $\epsilon >0$ implies $x\leq 0$. The additional hypothesis that $x\geq 0$ implies that $x=0$. Observe how $$\neg (\forall \epsilon >0;; x\leq \epsilon)=\exists \epsilon >0(\epsilon <x)$$ – Pedro Aug 25 '13 at 05:49
  • @Trancot Yes, looks good. Note that since $x>0$, we're allowed to let $\epsilon=x/2$, since $x/2$ is positive. Does it make sense why we don't need to consider the case when $x<0$? – Adriano Aug 25 '13 at 05:51