There is this problem:
"What is the smallest equivalence relation on the set {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} containing the relation {(1,2), (1,3), (4,5)}?"
Per my understanding, an equivalence relation need to satisfy three properties, reflexivity, transitivity, and symmetry.
Per that requirement, wouldn't the smallest equivalent relation be {(1,1), (1,2), (1,3), (2,1), (2,2), (3,1), (3,3), (4, 4), (4,5),(5,4), (5,5)}?
However, when I search the problem online, the set would include (2,3) and (3,2) in them. Why is there a need for these two elements? Why not even more elements such as (3,4) and (4,3), etc?
