Suppose I have any second degree conic and a point $P$ lying within the conic. A family of lines pass through this point $P$. We have to find the line for which the area of the corresponding section is minimised. And separately, we want to find a second line, for which the perimeter is minimised. Given is a example traced out in desmos, where we want to minimise the area $[ABC]$ and separately minimise perimeter of triangle $ABC$.

And here is another example, to illustrate that we want to minimize the area and perimeter for a general second degree conic, showing the situation for a parabola. Where we want to find the inclination of the straight line through P so that the perimeter of the yellow part is maximum. And we want to find a separate condition so that the area is maximum (These are two questions). 
I decided to work on a simpler problem first, that of a pair of straight lines. One may quite easily workout the case by using the general equation of a pair of straight lines, that is given by
$$ ax^2 + 2hxy + by^2 + 2gx + 2fy + c = 0$$
and solving for points in common with $y = mx + c$, and just minimising the determinant, perimeter may be worked out using the distance formula. However a similar method doesn't seem plausible for the other cases. I thought a geometrical interpetration of the same might be a bit better.
My question is, how can we interpret and solve this problem by geometrical or visual arguments? If not, how can we generalise the same for a general second degree conic?
The problem was posed in a high school examination, and is thought to have a nice geometrical answer, which I haven't been able to figure out.
EDIT: After fiddling a bit, I figured out that for a pair of straight lines, the minimum perimeter is achieved when the line touches a circle which has the pair of tangents given by the pair of straight lines, I suppose considering a non Euclidean plane would help to handle the other cases geometrically? My attempts at doing it have failed.