I'm a little bit confused about the point of local base for which definition defined as in here and the answer here. I made some example and came to the below statement and example.
Statement: While neighborhoods are a general concept that exists for every point, a local base is a more specific and structured collection of open sets designed to describe the local topology around a particular point.
Example:
Consider the topological space X = {a, b, c} with the topology τ={∅,{a},{b},{a,b},{a,b,c}}. This is a simple space where {a,b} is the only non-trivial open set.
Point a:
Neighborhoods: Every open set containing a is a neighborhood of a. Therefore, {a}, {a,b}, and {a,b,c} are neighborhoods of a.
Local Base: In this case, we can define a local base for a explicitly as {{a},{a,b}}. This collection satisfies the conditions of a local base at a.
Point c:
Neighborhoods: Every open set containing c is a neighborhood of c. Therefore, {c} and {a,b,c} are neighborhoods of c.
Local Base: It's not possible to find a local base for c in this topology. A local base should contain open sets that are nested within each other, covering c and fitting into any larger open set containing c. However, in this example, there are no open sets smaller than {c} that could form part of a local base for c.
The question is whether the above statement and example correct? Thanks in advance.