Problem
For stones of the same quality (e.g. the same colour), the monetary value of a diamond is proportional to the square of its mass (i.e. $C\propto M^2$). Find the monetary loss ($\Delta C$) incurred by laser-cutting a diamond worth $C_0$ into two pieces whose masses are in the ratio $a:b$ relative to the original diamond.
Desired Solution
According to the solutions in the back of the textbook.
$\frac{2abC}{(a+b)^2}$
Attempt at Solution
Note: I strongly suspect I am overcomplicating this question, but I have done this question over 3-4 times (building on each other), and would just like another brain to sort out the junk from the jewellery.
(i) Get the new masses ($M_a$ & $M_b$) in terms of the ratio $a:b$.
$M = M\cdot 1 = M\frac{a+b}{a+b} = \frac{M}{a+b} (a+b)= \frac{M \cdot a}{a+b }+ \frac{M\cdot b}{a+b}$
Since $M = M_a + M_b$, by comparing terms we can assert that $M_a = \frac{Ma}{a+b}$ and $M_b = \frac{Mb}{a+b}$.
(ii) Define the old cost and the new cost in terms of $M$, $M_a$, and $M_b$
The old cost, or the initial cost is, $C_0 \propto M^2 \Rightarrow C_0 = kM^2$ , where $k$ is the cost per mass squared.
The new cost, after the diamonds are cut up, is $C_N \propto M_a^2 + M_b^2$ and since we can assume that $k$ doesn't change (e.g. the price of diamonds on the market is stable), then $C_N = k M_a^2 + k M_b^2$.
(iii) Find the difference in cost (i.e. $\Delta C$)
$\Delta C = \text{old cost} - \text{new cost} = kM^2 - k(M_a^2+M_b^2)= k(M^2 - M_a^2-M_b^2)$
Based on what we found in (i):
$\Delta C= k(M^2-(\frac{a\cdot M}{a+b})^2 - (\frac{b\cdot M}{a+b})^2)$ $= k(M^2 - (\frac{a}{a+b})^2 M^2- (\frac{b}{a+b})^2 M^2) = kM^2(1-\frac{a^2+b^2}{(a+b)^2})$
And since $C_0 = kM^2$
$\Delta C = C(1-\frac{a^2+b^2}{(a+b)^2})$
Which is quite different to
$\Delta C = \frac{2abC}{(a+b)^2}$
To all my fellow mathbarians, where didst I misstep?
EDIT: So given the solution, I am stoked. Nevertheless, I wonder whether this is the only way. It is long-winded, but there is no "standard" for how long a solution should be. I didn't expect this to be that long, since I found it in a Year 10 math textbook. I am a university student, and I often overcomplicate things, so I wonder whether that happened here.