We first take a random sample of $8$ students, record their final score in $2018$, and check their final scores again in $2019$.
$2018: 76, 73, 66, 95, 75, 78, 96, 93$
$2019: 75, 80, 70, 93, 81, 90, 88, 79$
We're testing whether the grades have improved for these 8 students.
Since we're looking to see if the grades have "improved", aren't we looking for evidence that they have increased and not decreased?
These are the null and alternative hypotheses I wrote up to convey my reasoning:
$H$$0$ : $μ$1 $-$ $μ$2 ≥ $0$
$H$$1$ : $μ$1 $-$ $μ$2 < $0$
From what I know, the alternative hypothesis always has to hold the remaining outcomes dictated by the null hypothesis, hence my confusion.
I was told the correct hypotheses tests were:
$H$$0$ : $μ$1 $=$ $μ$2
$H$$1$ : $μ$1 $≠$ $μ$2
I'm sure the word 'improved' has to affect the direction of the hypotheses tests of this t-test but I don't know anymore.
Thanks