8

If $f(z)$ is holomorphic, does it follow that $g(z)=\overline{f(z)}$ is holomorphic?

I'm looking at $$\lim_{z\rightarrow a}\dfrac{g(z)-g(a)}{z-a} = \lim_{z\rightarrow a}\dfrac{\overline{f(z)-f(a)}}{z-a}$$

Can we pull the limit out to get $\overline{\lim_{z\rightarrow a}\dfrac{f(z)-f(a)}{z-a}}$?

Paul S.
  • 3,345
  • 4
  • 32
  • 60
  • 7
    $f(z) = z$ is holomorphic, but $\overline{f(z)} = \overline{z}$ is not. – tylerc0816 Oct 05 '13 at 20:07
  • 1
    Note that if you tried to pull the complex conjugate out of the limit, you would have to conjugate the denominator. – Cameron Williams Oct 05 '13 at 20:10
  • @CameronWilliams Yes, good point. I forgot that. – Paul S. Oct 05 '13 at 20:11
  • 1
    But $$g(z) = \overline{f(\overline{z})}$$ is holomorphic (on the reflection of the domain of $f$). – Daniel Fischer Oct 05 '13 at 20:33
  • 1
    @DanielFischer, why is that? – Ian Feb 02 '14 at 22:34
  • 1
    @Ian Because one conjugates twice. The composition of a $\mathbb{C}$-linear map with an antilinear map is antilinear, the composition of two antilinear maps is linear. In the same way (and for the same reason), the composition of a holomorphic and an antiholomorphic map is antiholomorphic, and the composition of two antiholomorphic maps is holomorphic. Conjugation is antiholomorphic, so the composition of holomorphic maps with an even number of conjugations, in whatever order, is holomorphic; with an odd number of conjugations, antiholomorphic. – Daniel Fischer Feb 02 '14 at 22:40
  • Related: https://math.stackexchange.com/q/3713822/532409 – Quillo Jun 10 '20 at 10:34

2 Answers2

14

If $f(z)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y)$ then $\overline{f(z)}=u(x,y)-iv(x,y)$. The Cauchy-Riemann equations imply $v=\operatorname{const}$. Hence $u(x,y)=\operatorname{const}$

njguliyev
  • 14,473
  • 1
  • 26
  • 43
11

No. When you took the conjugation out, it forces you to conjugate $z-a$ in the denominator.

An easy (and canonical) way to see that the conjugate of a holomorphic function is not holomorphic is to consider $z\mapsto \overline z$. This is easily confirmed by looking at the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

Martin Argerami
  • 205,756