a,b $\in$ $\mathbb{R}$
Original statement: $\exists a$ such that $\forall b$, $a+b>0$
My negation: $\forall a$, $\exists b$ such that $a+b \leq 0$
Is my negation correct? If it is, is the negation true whereas the original statement is false?
I drew this conclusion because my interpretation of the original statement was that there was one $a$ that would satisfy the inequality regardless of what value of $b$ was chosen (obviously not true). My understanding of the negation statement was that you could choose different values of $b$ to satisfy the inequality based on the value of $a$ you are dealing with (so $b$ is not fixed unlike $a$ in the original statement). Or am I wrong and in fact $b$ is fixed like $a$ was before? If I am wrong then I am stuck on trying figure out which statement is true. Any help is appreciated.