We know path connectedness implies connectedness . Is the other direction true or false? I ve been trying to prove it but cannot do it. I cannot find a counter-example either. math is hard.
Asked
Active
Viewed 282 times
2 Answers
3
My favorite counterexample is Cantor's leaky tent.
Not only is it connected, but not path connected, removing a single point renders it completely disconnected! (Since I haven't taken topology yet, this is what prompted me to look up what "connected" really means)
Henry Swanson
- 12,972
0
Look up the topologist' sine. It is not true. That is why you cannot prove it :p.
Another funky one is $\mathbb{R}_{\text{cocountable}}$.
LASV
- 3,108
Also, is there a university library you could check books out of?
– Henry Swanson Dec 10 '13 at 00:00